Lee J C
Ajou University School of Medicine, Department of the History of Medicine.
Uisahak. 1995;4(2):147-57.
The purpose of this article is to analyze the two early health care reform groups: the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL), the first organization to try to initiate compulsory health insurance in the U.S., and the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care (CCMC), a self-formed committee to study the economics of medical care. By viewing health policy from a historical perspective, we can find a variety of possible alternatives that would have been implemented in different place and time. Unlike positivistic studies on health policy whose only concern is with successful programs, the history of health policy is interested not only in success but also in failure of policy. Reformers from the late 1910s through early 1930s recognized health insurance as a medical issue not as a welfare issue. As long as health insurance belonged to medical domain, policy on health insurance remained separate from public policy. If so, who analyzed and decided the policy? This article argues that social reformers in this period should have tried to launch health insurance not from the front of medical care but in the field of public welfare. This shift in the direction of health care reform would inevitably have caused changes in the strategies accepted.
美国劳工立法协会(AALL),这是美国首个试图推行强制医疗保险的组织;以及医疗成本委员会(CCMC),一个自行组建的研究医疗保健经济学的委员会。通过从历史角度审视卫生政策,我们能够找到在不同地点和时间可能实施的各种替代方案。与仅关注成功项目的实证主义卫生政策研究不同,卫生政策的历史不仅关注政策是否成功,还关注政策的失败之处。从20世纪10年代末到30年代初的改革者将医疗保险视为一个医疗问题,而非福利问题。只要医疗保险属于医疗领域,医疗保险政策就与公共政策分开。倘若如此,由谁来分析和决定政策呢?本文认为,这一时期的社会改革者应尝试从公共福利领域而非医疗保健前沿推出医疗保险。医疗保健改革方向的这种转变将不可避免地导致所采用策略的变化。