Suppr超能文献

笛卡尔与动物的松果体:一种常见的误解。

Descartes and the pineal gland in animals: a frequent misinterpretation.

作者信息

Finger S

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Program in Neural Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO. 63130, USA.

出版信息

J Hist Neurosci. 1995 Sep-Dec;4(3-4):166-82. doi: 10.1080/09647049509525637.

Abstract

René Descartes presented a number of reasons for his choice of the pineal gland as a logical place for the soul to interact with the physical machinery of the body. It is often stated that one of his reasons was that he believed animals do not have pineal glands, whereas humans alone possess a soul and this small structure. This is a misinterpretation of Descartes. The philosopher knew that barnyard and other animals possess pineal glands, having seen this with his own eyes. His point was that the pineal is unique in humans only because of a special function - acting as the seat for the rational soul.

摘要

勒内·笛卡尔提出了诸多理由,说明他为何选择松果体作为灵魂与身体物理机制相互作用的合理位置。人们常说,他的理由之一是,他认为动物没有松果体,而只有人类拥有灵魂和这个小结构。这是对笛卡尔的误解。这位哲学家知道,家畜和其他动物都有松果体,这是他亲眼所见。他的观点是,松果体在人类中独一无二,只是因为它具有一种特殊功能——作为理性灵魂的所在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验