Anderson M
Popul Stud (Camb). 1998 Mar;52(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000150146.
Data on family size by year of marriage, age at marriage, and duration of marriage, from the 1911 Fertility Census, are compared between Scotland, England and Wales, Irish county boroughs, and the rest of Ireland. While means show significant inter-country differences, from the 1880s marked similarities are found across all the countries in the pattern of fertility decline, strongly suggesting significant fertility limitation in rural Ireland well before 1911. Noting the implications for the use of rural Ireland as a natural fertility population, the data are instead compared with the Coale-Trussell and Hinde-Woods schedules. The former provides more plausible results, which imply strong period rather than cohort effects in the fertility decline. Except in rural Ireland, little evidence is found for significant fertility limitation early in marriage among younger marrying couples, but many older marrying couples appear to have stopped childbearing at very low parities from an early date.
根据1911年生育普查数据,对苏格兰、英格兰和威尔士、爱尔兰郡级市以及爱尔兰其他地区按结婚年份、结婚年龄和婚姻持续时间划分的家庭规模数据进行了比较。虽然均值显示出显著的国家间差异,但从19世纪80年代起,所有国家在生育率下降模式上都存在明显的相似性,这有力地表明,早在1911年之前,爱尔兰农村地区就存在显著的生育限制。考虑到将爱尔兰农村地区用作自然生育人口的影响,转而将这些数据与科尔-特鲁塞尔(Coale-Trussell)和欣德-伍兹(Hinde-Woods)时间表进行比较。前者提供了更合理的结果,这意味着在生育率下降中存在强烈的时期效应而非队列效应。除了爱尔兰农村地区,几乎没有证据表明年轻结婚夫妇在婚姻早期存在显著的生育限制,但许多年长结婚夫妇似乎很早就以很低的子女数停止生育了。