Perry M
School of Primary Care, Rusholme Health Centre, Manchester, UK.
Soc Hist Med. 2000 Apr;13(1):111-29. doi: 10.1093/shm/13.1.111.
During the Second World War, medical academics hoped to reform medical practice and education in Great Britain, increasing doctors' sensitivity to the social and environmental causes of ill health and orientating them towards prevention. At the start of the National Health Service (NHS), central planning aimed to raise the status of isolated urban general practitioners (GPs) by grouping them in an experimental health centre. This offered a locus for social medicine, encouraging cooperation and research with local authority staff (nurses, midwives, and social workers). The Manchester case study confirms that health centre working could not be disseminated while conditions for teamwork were absent elsewhere. The failure of academic planning can be attributed to a top-down approach upon demoralized urban practice. While the participants did not form an autonomous group, economic incentives drove the growth of group practice elsewhere and made health centres superfluous to government. The College of General Practitioners developed in parallel, offering an alternative path towards an academic discipline. The case study also suggests a relationship between the emergence of groups and a psychological orientation in practice. A patient-centred model became important within teaching and gave identity to the displine, but it probably had little impact on everyday practice.
第二次世界大战期间,医学学术界希望改革英国的医疗实践与教育,提高医生对健康问题的社会和环境成因的敏感度,并引导他们关注预防工作。在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)建立之初,中央规划旨在通过将孤立的城市全科医生(GPs)集中到一个实验性健康中心来提高他们的地位。这为社会医学提供了一个场所,鼓励与地方当局工作人员(护士、助产士和社会工作者)开展合作与研究。曼彻斯特的案例研究证实,在其他地方缺乏团队合作条件的情况下,健康中心的工作模式无法得到推广。学术规划的失败可归因于对士气低落的城市医疗实践采取的自上而下的方法。虽然参与者没有形成一个自主的团体,但经济激励推动了其他地方团体医疗的发展,使健康中心对政府来说变得多余。全科医生学院同时发展起来,为走向一门学科提供了另一条途径。该案例研究还表明了团体的出现与实践中的一种心理取向之间的关系。以患者为中心的模式在教学中变得很重要,并赋予了该学科特色,但它可能对日常实践影响不大。