Zurak N
University Department of Neurology, Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zegreb, Croatia.
Med Secoli. 2000;12(1):147-58.
The drafts, epistles, headwords, and conceptual basis known as the fibrillar theory of Giorgio Baglivi, published in his book entitled De fibra motrice et morbosa, were analyzed in an attempt to re-evaluate Baglivi's contribution, generally considered quite modest, to the development of scientific thought on the nervous system functions. The analysis revealed Baglivi's identification of the reflex organization, vegetative nervous system function, and neural aspect of the vasomotor function to be surprisingly valuable. I believe that the lucidity and genuine contemporariness of Baglivi's standpoints arise the question of the historical precedence in the discovery of these functions (it is usually attributed to F.X. Bichat for vegetative nervous system, and to Claude Bernard for vasomotor nerves). In the light of these facts, the need of an expert revision of the history of discovering nervous system functions is suggested.
分析了乔治·巴利维的纤维理论中的草稿、书信、词条和概念基础,这些内容发表在他的《论纤维运动与疾病》一书中,目的是重新评估巴利维对神经系统功能科学思想发展的贡献,他的贡献通常被认为相当有限。分析表明,巴利维对反射组织、自主神经系统功能以及血管运动功能的神经方面的识别具有惊人的价值。我认为,巴利维观点的清晰性和真正的时代性引发了关于这些功能发现的历史优先权问题(自主神经系统功能的发现通常归功于F.X.比夏,血管运动神经的发现归功于克劳德·贝尔纳)。鉴于这些事实,建议对神经系统功能发现的历史进行专家修订。