[18世纪末南锡的“药学结论”：在“综合”与“论文”之间]
[The "conclusions of Pharmacy" in Nancy, at the end of the 18th century: between "synthèses" and "thèses"].
作者信息
Julien P, Martin J
出版信息
Rev Hist Pharm (Paris). 1995;42(307):401-7.
A special requirement of the law for apothecaries in Nancy in 1764 imposed on the candidates for a master's degree was the written response to four questions following their practical examinations. Two documents heretofore unpublished show the results of this obligation: the Conclusions de Pharmacie by Joseph Pierson (1765) and the Conclusions de Pharmacie et de Chimie by François Mandel (1771). The authors of the present article comment on these documents and make an attempt to place them in the confused history of "synthèses" and "thèses".
1764年，南锡市对药剂师的法律有一项特殊要求，即硕士学位候选人在实践考试后要书面回答四个问题。迄今未发表的两份文件展示了这项要求的结果：约瑟夫·皮尔逊的《药学结论》（1765年）和弗朗索瓦·曼德尔的《药学与化学结论》（1771年）。本文作者对这些文件进行了评论，并试图将它们置于“综合论文”和“学位论文”的混乱历史中。
Zotero 插件