Abstract
In the beginning of "Year IV", Cabanis writes an Essay on the guillotine. Strangely enough, he advocated the scaffold against Soemmering and Süe on an argumented physiological ground, while he strongly condemns it from a political and moral standpoint. This ambivalence could be explained by the paradoxes of the culpability feelt by the humanist practitionner who had to represent the Paris Hospitals Commission when the machine to be the Great Terror's servant was tested, for the first time, by Louis, Guillotine and Pinel.
摘要
相似文献
1
[Cabanis before the guillotine].
Hist Sci Med. 1998;32(1):69-73.
2
[Revolutionary messages from Dr. Cabanis (1757-1808)].
Rev Med Suisse. 2014 Sep 3;10(440):1638-9.
3
[Doctor Guillotin didn't believe in the life of the head after the axe].
Lakartidningen. 2009;106(21-22):1499-501.
4
The perils of Antoinette.
New York Rev Books. 2007 Jan 11;54(1):59-63.
5
The impact of the Cabanis reform on the historical formation of the Argentine university and on higher education in health.
Salud Colect. 2019 Mar 4;15:e2106. doi: 10.18294/sc.2019.2106.
6
[THE HISTORY OF THE GUILLOTINE (JOSEPH IGNACE GUILLOTIN)].
Orv Hetil. 1964 Mar 10;105:467-9.
7
Reflections on medical reform: Cabanis' Coup d'CEuil.
Clio Med. 1995;29:166-80.
8
[The French revolution--a revolution even for health care].
Lakartidningen. 1989 Jul 12;86(28-29):2535-7.
9
Light and enlightenment: Cabanis, ideology, and the role of phosphorus in the brain.
J Hist Neurosci. 1996 Dec;5(3):254-64. doi: 10.1080/09647049609525674.
10
[Doctor Guillotin and the machine named after him (1)].
Rev Med Suisse. 2012 Jul 11;8(348):1478-9.
Zotero 插件