Theunissen B
Instituut voor Geschiedenis der Natuurwetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht.
Gewina. 1993;16(4):287-307.
This article analyses the backgrounds of Hugo de Vries' stance with regard to the Dutch nature study movement, which rapidly gained momentum in the 1890s. The movement has received little attention from historians until now. A short exposition of its aims and intentions, as envisioned by its main protagonists, Heimans and Thijsse, is provided. It is shown that De Vries' scientific ideas on the improvability of the human species and his liberal social views led him to conclude that both socialism and right-wing 'laisser-faire' ideologies were scientifically unsound. Hereditary theory implied that the human races were genetically stable entities which could not be improved by selection of any kind. The progress of society could only be furthered by placing the emphasis on the individual and its cognitive and social development. According to de Vries, the study of nature provided an excellent means to this end, since it contributed to the individual's personal development as well as to its happiness.
本文分析了雨果·德·弗里斯(Hugo de Vries)在19世纪90年代迅速兴起的荷兰自然研究运动中所持立场的背景。直到现在,这场运动都很少受到历史学家的关注。文中简要阐述了该运动的主要倡导者海曼斯(Heimans)和蒂伊斯(Thijsse)所设想的目标和意图。研究表明,德·弗里斯关于人类物种可改良的科学观点以及他的自由主义社会观点,使他得出结论:社会主义和右翼“自由放任”意识形态在科学上都是不合理的。遗传理论表明,人类种族是基因稳定的实体,无法通过任何形式的选择得到改良。社会的进步只能通过强调个人及其认知和社会发展来推进。按照德·弗里斯的说法,对自然的研究为此提供了一个极好的途径,因为它有助于个人的自我发展以及幸福。