Corcos A, Monaghan F
J Hered. 1985 May-Jun;76(3):187-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110062.
Recently, doubt has been cast on the view that de Vries developed the idea of disjunction independently of Mendel. Arguments are based on de Vries' own writings that showed the F2 data of his numerous crosses are reported as 3:1 ratios only after 1900. They also show that his theory of inheritance becomes quasi Mendelian only after 1900. The authors of this review paper cannot but agree with de Vries' critics that he did not develop his law of disjunction independently of Mendel. They also raise some questions that, hopefully, will lead to a reanalysis of de Vries' theory of inheritance in 1900.
最近，有人对德弗里斯独立于孟德尔提出分离概念的观点提出了质疑。论据基于德弗里斯自己的著作，这些著作表明，他众多杂交实验的F2数据直到1900年之后才被报告为3:1的比例。这些著作还表明，他的遗传理论直到1900年之后才变得近似孟德尔式。这篇综述论文的作者不得不认同德弗里斯的批评者的观点，即他并非独立于孟德尔提出他的分离定律。他们还提出了一些问题，希望这些问题将促使人们对1900年德弗里斯的遗传理论进行重新分析。
