Suppr超能文献

参与科学会议:科学学科史研究的一种新人物传记方法——以1951年至1972年的免疫学为例

Participation in scientific meetings: a new prosopographical approach to the disciplinary history of science--the case of immunology, 1951-72.

作者信息

Söderqvist T, Silverstein A M

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 1994 Aug;24(3):513-48. doi: 10.1177/030631279402400303.

Abstract

To handle the enormous amount of sources in modern and contemporary science, the historian can use different quantitative methods, particularly varieties of citation analysis. So far, all these methods have been based on publication data. Taking as its point of departure the fact that meetings constitute a pervasive, yet neglected, aspect of science, this paper introduces analysis of participation in scientific meetings. The strength of this new prosopographical method is illustrated by an analysis of international immunological meetings in the period 1951-72. Frequency of participation in meetings seems to be correlated to professional standing in immunology. By means of cluster analysis of participation data, the subdisciplinary structure and dynamics of immunology can be reconstructed.

摘要

为了处理现代和当代科学中大量的资料来源,历史学家可以采用不同的定量方法,尤其是各种引文分析方法。到目前为止,所有这些方法都是基于出版数据的。本文以会议是科学中一个普遍存在但却被忽视的方面这一事实为出发点,引入了对科学会议参与情况的分析。对1951年至1972年期间国际免疫学会议的分析说明了这种新的人物传记方法的优势。会议参与频率似乎与免疫学领域的专业地位相关。通过对参与数据的聚类分析,可以重建免疫学的子学科结构和动态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验