Cushman W C, Materson B J, Williams D W, Reda D J
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Hypertension. 2001 Oct;38(4):953-7. doi: 10.1161/hy1001.096212.
Pulse pressure has been more strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes, especially myocardial infarction and heart failure, than has systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial pressure in a variety of populations. Little is known, however, of the comparative effects of various classes of antihypertensive agents on pulse pressure. In retrospective analyses of the Veterans Affairs Single-Drug Therapy for Hypertension Study, we compared changes in pulse pressure with 6 classes of antihypertensive agents: 1292 men with diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 109 mm Hg on placebo were randomized to receive hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, captopril, clonidine, diltiazem, prazosin, or placebo. Drug doses were titrated to achieve a goal diastolic blood pressure of <90 mm Hg during a 4- to 8-week medication titration phase. Pulse pressure change (placebo subtracted) was assessed from baseline to the end of the 3-month titration and 1-year maintenance. Mean baseline systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures were 152, 99, and 53 mm Hg, respectively. Reductions in pulse pressure during titration were greater (P<0.001) with clonidine (6.7 mm Hg) and hydrochlorothiazide (6.2 mm Hg) than with captopril (2.5 mm Hg), diltiazem (1.6 mm Hg), and atenolol (1.4 mm Hg); reduction with prazosin (3.9 mm Hg) was similar to all but clonidine. After 1 year, pulse pressure was reduced significantly more (P<0.001) with hydrochlorothiazide (8.6 mm Hg) than with captopril and atenolol (4.1 mm Hg with both); clonidine (6.3 mm Hg), diltiazem (5.5 mm Hg), and prazosin (5.0 mm Hg) were intermediate. These data show that classes of antihypertensive agents differ in their ability to reduce pulse pressure. Whether these differences affect rates of cardiovascular events remains to be determined.
在各类人群中,脉压与心血管疾病结局(尤其是心肌梗死和心力衰竭)的关联比收缩压、舒张压或平均动脉压更为密切。然而,对于各类抗高血压药物对脉压的比较作用,人们了解甚少。在退伍军人事务部高血压单药治疗研究的回顾性分析中,我们比较了6类抗高血压药物引起的脉压变化:1292名舒张压在95至109mmHg且服用安慰剂的男性被随机分配接受氢氯噻嗪、阿替洛尔、卡托普利、可乐定、地尔硫䓬、哌唑嗪或安慰剂治疗。在4至8周的药物滴定阶段,调整药物剂量以实现舒张压目标值<90mmHg。从基线到3个月滴定期结束和1年维持期结束,评估脉压变化(减去安慰剂组变化)。平均基线收缩压、舒张压和脉压分别为152mmHg、99mmHg和53mmHg。滴定期间,可乐定(6.7mmHg)和氢氯噻嗪(6.2mmHg)引起的脉压降低幅度大于卡托普利(2.5mmHg)、地尔硫䓬(1.6mmHg)和阿替洛尔(1.4mmHg)(P<0.001);哌唑嗪(3.9mmHg)引起的脉压降低幅度除与可乐定不同外,与其他药物相似。1年后,氢氯噻嗪(8.6mmHg)引起的脉压降低幅度显著大于卡托普利和阿替洛尔(两者均为4.1mmHg)(P<0.001);可乐定(6.3mmHg)、地尔硫䓬(5.5mmHg)和哌唑嗪(5.0mmHg)引起的脉压降低幅度居中。这些数据表明,各类抗高血压药物降低脉压的能力存在差异。这些差异是否会影响心血管事件的发生率仍有待确定。