Chervenak Frank A, McCullough Laurence B
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Spring;2(1):23-4.
[The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] takes the view that respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman should be almost absolute and [the American Academy of Pediatrics] takes the view that respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman should be limited or prima facie in character. ACOG's reading of this central bioethical principle admits of virtually no exceptions, while AAP's reading does allow exceptions....A complete account of obstetric ethics that would apply in clinical practice during the intrapartum period must take into account both negative and positive autonomy-based rights of the pregnant woman and beneficence-based obligations to the at-term fetus -- and to the pregnant woman, as well. Such an account will be, we believe, more clinically applicable than the accounts offered by ACOG and AAP.
美国妇产科医师学会认为,对孕妇自主权的尊重几乎应是绝对的,而美国儿科学会则认为,对孕妇自主权的尊重应受到限制或具有表面性。美国妇产科医师学会对这一核心生物伦理原则的解读几乎不允许有例外情况,而美国儿科学会的解读则允许有例外……一份适用于分娩期临床实践的完整产科伦理学阐述,必须兼顾基于消极和积极自主权的孕妇权利以及基于行善原则对足月胎儿——以及对孕妇自身——的义务。我们认为,这样一种阐述在临床上将比美国妇产科医师学会和美国儿科学会提供的阐述更具适用性。