Doukas D J, Elkins T E
Department of Family Practice, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Prim Care. 1993 Sep;20(3):721-8.
Recent position statements by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the emergence of legal and ethical analyses on the nature of compelled cesarean section have instigated much discussion on how the primary care physician should respond when a pregnant woman refuses to consent to surgery. This article clarifies the ethical obligations of the physician and mother and the nature of their relationships to the fetus. The formulation of an agreement, the physician-mother-fetal contract, is discussed as a teaching tool for helping to clarify the roles of all parties. Also, the function of the primary care physician as proactive educator is highlighted.
美国儿科学会和美国妇产科学会最近发表的立场声明,以及关于强制剖宫产性质的法律和伦理分析的出现,引发了许多关于当孕妇拒绝同意手术时初级保健医生应如何应对的讨论。本文阐明了医生和母亲的伦理义务以及他们与胎儿关系的性质。作为一种有助于明确各方角色的教学工具,讨论了一份协议即医生-母亲-胎儿契约的制定。此外,还强调了初级保健医生作为积极教育者的作用。