Suppr超能文献

无效性与单方面决策:一种不同的观点。

Futility and unilateral decision making: a different view.

作者信息

Mahowald Mary B

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Spring;2(2):211-3.

Abstract

... Resuscitation of PVS patients is futile if the goal is to restore the patient to a cognitive or conscious state but not if the goal is restoration of respiratory function. The judgment of futility in either case is based on nonmedical (as well as medical) values or criteria, i.e., the value of cognitive life vs. the value of noncognitive life. If all of the affected parties concur that noncognitive recovery is a goal not worth achieving, a DNR order should be written. Lacking such concurrence, justification for a DNR order might be found in societal assessment of the burdens and benefits to others (besides the patient) of providing treatment in such circumstances. This is not a decision to be made unilaterally by a single physician, whose values are not necessarily reflective of those of the patient, family members, other physicians, or society at large.

摘要

……如果目标是使患者恢复到有认知或有意识的状态,持续性植物状态(PVS)患者的复苏是徒劳的,但如果目标是恢复呼吸功能则并非如此。两种情况下对徒劳的判断都基于非医学(以及医学)价值观或标准,即认知生命的价值与非认知生命的价值。如果所有受影响的各方都一致认为非认知性恢复是一个不值得追求的目标,就应该下达“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱。如果缺乏这种一致意见,下达DNR医嘱的理由可能在于社会对在这种情况下提供治疗给他人(除患者外)带来的负担和益处的评估。这不是由单个医生单方面做出的决定,因为其价值观不一定反映患者、家庭成员、其他医生或整个社会的价值观。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验