Craft Naomi, Smith Richard
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):245-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.245.
We sent a questionnaire survey to a random sample of 125 correspondents to the BMJ who had previously sent a letter which had been rejected. The objective was to evaluate the policy of sending on some unpublished letters to the authors of the articles to which they referred. There were 94 replies, a response rate of 75%. The key finding was that although most respondents agreed with the policy, a third thought it unconstructive. A quarter of the respondents said that the BMJ policy would discourage them from sending a letter to the journal for publication. This survey has led to a change of policy at the BMJ. Letters which are not published are not now sent on to the authors of the original articles.
我们向《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)的125名曾提交过被拒信件的通信作者随机抽取样本发送了问卷调查。目的是评估将一些未发表信件转寄给其所提及文章作者的政策。共收到94份回复,回复率为75%。关键发现是,尽管大多数受访者赞同该政策,但三分之一的人认为该政策没有建设性。四分之一的受访者表示,BMJ的这一政策会使他们不愿向该期刊投稿发表信件。这项调查促使BMJ改变了政策。现在,未发表的信件不再转寄给原文作者。