• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cloning: revisiting an old debate.

作者信息

Verhey Allen D

出版信息

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):227-34. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0189.

DOI:10.1353/ken.0.0189
PMID:11645279
Abstract

The debate about cloning that took place 25 years ago, although directed toward a different sort of cloning, elucidates fundamental issues currently at stake in reproductive technologies and research. Paul Ramsey and Joseph Fletcher were participants in this early debate. The differences between Ramsey and Fletcher about the meaning and sufficiency of freedom, the understanding and weighing of good and evil, the connection between embodiment and personhood, the relationship of humans with nature, and the meaning of parenthood suggest both a broader agenda for the debate about cloning and a cautious move forward in the development of embryo-splitting.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cloning: revisiting an old debate.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):227-34. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0189.
2
Toward a theological construct for the new biology: an analysis of Rahner, Fletcher, and Ramsey.迈向新生物学的神学建构：对拉纳、弗莱彻和拉姆齐的分析。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1995 Spring;11(2):429-55.
3
A response to the Vatican document on IVF and related issues.对梵蒂冈关于体外受精及相关问题文件的回应。
Lutheran Theol J. 1987 Aug;21(2):82-9.
4
The embryo debate.胚胎辩论。
Ethics Med. 1990 Spring;6(1):1-4.
5
Where theologians and geneticists meet.神学家与遗传学家的交汇之处。
Dialog. 1994 Winter;33(1):7-16.
6
Begetting and cloning.生育与克隆。
First Things. 1997 Jun-Jul;No. 74:41-3.
7
Report on human cloning through embryo splitting: an amber light.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):251-82. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0067.
8
Reproductive technologies: ethical implications.生殖技术：伦理影响。
Linacre Q. 1996 Feb;63(1):25-43. doi: 10.1080/20508549.1999.11878333.
9
A Christian philosophy on experimenting with life.
Aust J Forensic Sci. 1985 Jun;17:131-40. doi: 10.1080/00450618509413217.
10
A Protestant view of new reproductive technologies.新生殖技术的新教观点。
Second Opin. 1990 Jul;14:94-106.

引用本文的文献

1
Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism.引发先天与后天之争：生物伦理学与基因决定论。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):526-30. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008417.
2
Evolution of the clonal man: inventing science unfiction.克隆人的演变：创造科学幻想小说
J Med Humanit. 2000 Fall;21(3):159-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1009078620330.