Powers Madison
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Jun;6(2):129-44. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0009.
Justice is widely thought to consist in equality. For many theorists, the central question has been: Equality of what? The author argues that the ideal of equality distorts practical reasoning and has deeply counterintuitive implications. Moreover, an alternative view of distributive justice can give a better account of what egalitarians should care about than can any of the competing ideals of equality.
人们普遍认为正义在于平等。对许多理论家来说,核心问题一直是:何种平等?作者认为,平等的理想扭曲了实践推理,并且具有严重违反直觉的含义。此外,一种关于分配正义的替代观点,比任何相互竞争的平等理想,都能更好地说明平等主义者应该关心的问题。