Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Truman v. Thomas. 9 Jun 1980.杜鲁门诉托马斯。1980年6月9日。
Wests Calif Report. 1980;165:308-18.
2
California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas.加利福尼亚州最高法院扩大了知情同意原则；医生有责任获取知情拒绝：杜鲁门诉托马斯案。
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev. 1980;1980(4):933-47.
3
Truman v. Thomas.杜鲁门诉托马斯案
Wests Calif Report. 1979 May 22;155:752-63.
4
Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians?
UMKC Law Rev. 1981 Spring;49(3):365-76.
5
From informed consent to a duty to convince: Truman v. Thomas.
Houst Law Rev. 1981 May;18(4):917-30.
6
Pap smears: physicians must disclose risk of refusal.巴氏涂片检查：医生必须告知拒绝检查的风险。
Nurs Law Ethics. 1981 Jan;2(1):3.
7
Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
Duquesne Law Rev. 1976 Spring;14(3):309-47.
8
The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.路易斯安那州医疗程序中未经同意和缺乏知情同意的相关学说。
LA Law Rev. 1983 Sep;45(1):1-38.
9
Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.侵权行为——知情同意——医疗信息披露的新方向——霍普诉莱普案及赖布尔诉休斯案
Univ B C Law Rev. 1981;15(2):475-97.
10
The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.医生向患者披露信息的标准：知情同意的相互竞争模式。
LA Law Rev. 1980 Fall;41(1):9-67.
Zotero 插件