High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
作者信息
Greenhouse Linda
出版信息
N Y Times Web. 1992 Jun 30:A1, A15-17.
PMID:11647923
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
N Y Times Web. 1992 Jun 30:A1, A15-17.
2
Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
Second Opin. 1993 Jan;18(3):104-9.
3
Workability of the undue burden test.
Temple Law Rev. 1993 Fall;66(3):1003-37.
4
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Univ Louisv J Fam Law. 1993;32(1):93-113.
5
Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
William Mary Bill Rights J. 1996;4(3):787-880.
6
Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
N Y Times Web. 1992 Apr 23:A1, B10-11.
7
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
Univ Dayton Law Rev. 1993 Spring;18(3):733-62.
8
Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev. 1993;13(1):467-88.
9
A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
Marquette Law Rev. 1987 Spring;70(3):534-71.
10
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
Wests Supreme Court Report. 1992 Jun 29;112:2791-885.
Zotero 插件