Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
作者信息
Goldstein Robert D
出版信息
William Mary Bill Rights J. 1996;4(3):787-880.
PMID:11660789
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.解读凯西案：构建女性的决策过程。
William Mary Bill Rights J. 1996;4(3):787-880.
2
Workability of the undue burden test.不当负担测试的可操作性。
Temple Law Rev. 1993 Fall;66(3):1003-37.
3
Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.计划生育联盟诉凯西案：堕胎法的现状
Second Opin. 1993 Jan;18(3):104-9.
4
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?宾夕法尼亚东南部计划生育组织诉凯西案：对罗诉韦德案的重申还是终结的开始？
Univ Louisv J Fam Law. 1993;32(1):93-113.
5
Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
N Y Univ Law Rev. 1993 Jun;68(3):597-638.
6
Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.计划生育联盟诉凯西案：生殖决策中安宁的终结。
Const Law J. 1993 Winter;4(1):47-95.
7
How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
Hastings Law J. 1994 Apr;45(4):867-959.
8
A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.隐私权的棘手问题：重新评估堕胎宪法权利的必要性。
Marquette Law Rev. 1987 Spring;70(3):534-71.
9
Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.凯西案、布雷案及其他：宗教自由与堕胎辩论
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev. 1993;13(1):467-88.
10
High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.最高法院以5比4的投票结果确认堕胎权，但允许宾夕法尼亚州的大部分限制措施。
N Y Times Web. 1992 Jun 30:A1, A15-17.
Zotero 插件