Donnelley Strachan
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 May-Jun;20(3):S8-13.
Section II, addressing the ethical justification of the uses of animals in science, does not offer "decisive" arguments for or against particular uses. Rather, conflicting values, goods, and responsibilities pertaining to both humans and animals are identified. Particular uses of animals demand the careful consideration of various ethical claims, which will always require the developed art and wisdom of ethical judgment and will never be reduced to a systematic science. Competing ultimate goods or values and the concrete complexity of the real world defy such rational, abstract, or logical harmony.
第二部分探讨了在科学中使用动物的伦理合理性,它并未提供支持或反对特定用途的“决定性”论据。相反,文中指出了与人类和动物相关的相互冲突的价值观、利益和责任。动物的特定用途需要仔细考量各种伦理主张,这始终需要成熟的伦理判断技巧和智慧,而且永远无法简化为一门系统的科学。相互竞争的终极利益或价值观以及现实世界的具体复杂性,使得这种理性、抽象或逻辑上的和谐难以实现。