Orlans F Barbara
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):163-71. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_7.
Laboratory animals, being vulnerable subjects, need the protection provided by adequate ethical review. This review falls primarily to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. A review committee's first duty is to identify which procedures ethically are unacceptable irrespective of any knowledge that might be derived. Examples are provided. These projects should be disapproved. Then, "on balance" judgments are assessed that weigh the animal harms against the potential benefits to humans. Several countries (but not the United States) use a classification system for ranking the degree of animal pain and distress. This type of assessment is essential for careful ethical analysis. Another way to enhance ethical discussion is to strive for a more balanced perspective of different viewpoints among members of decision making committees. Inclusion of representatives of animal welfare organizations and a greater proportion of nonanimal researchers would likely achieve this objective.
实验动物作为易受伤害的对象,需要适当的伦理审查提供保护。这项审查主要由机构动物护理和使用委员会负责。审查委员会的首要职责是确定哪些程序在伦理上是不可接受的,而不考虑可能获得的任何知识。文中给出了示例。这些项目应不予批准。然后,要评估“权衡利弊”的判断,即权衡动物所受伤害与对人类的潜在益处。几个国家(但不包括美国)使用一种分类系统来对动物疼痛和痛苦的程度进行排名。这种评估类型对于严谨的伦理分析至关重要。加强伦理讨论的另一种方法是努力在决策委员会成员中形成对不同观点更平衡的看法。纳入动物福利组织的代表和更大比例的非动物研究人员可能会实现这一目标。