• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沉默的遗产:生物伦理学与疼痛文化。

A legacy of silence: bioethics and the culture of pain.

作者信息

Rich Ben A

出版信息

J Med Humanit. 1997 Winter;18(4):233-59. doi: 10.1023/a:1025697920944.

DOI:10.1023/a:1025697920944
PMID:11655204
Abstract

For over 20 years the medical literature has carefully documented the undertreatment of all types of pain by physicians. During this same period, as the field of bioethics came of age, the phenomenon of undertreated pain received almost no attention from the bioethics literature. This article takes bioethicists to task for failing to recognize the undertreatment of pain as a major ethical, and not merely a clinical, failing of the medical profession. The nature and extent of the problem of undertreated pain is examined, as well as possible reasons for its disregard by bioethicists. The factors contributing to undertreated pain in the clinical setting are considered, as well as the hazards posed by recent failures to address ethically questionable clinical practices. Finally, suggestions are offered for refocusing the attention of bioethicists to this significant problem.

摘要

二十多年来,医学文献一直在详细记录医生对各类疼痛治疗不足的情况。在同一时期,随着生物伦理学领域的成熟,疼痛治疗不足这一现象在生物伦理学文献中几乎未受到关注。本文指责生物伦理学家未能认识到疼痛治疗不足是医学专业的一个主要伦理缺陷,而不仅仅是临床缺陷。本文探讨了疼痛治疗不足问题的性质和程度,以及生物伦理学家忽视该问题的可能原因。文中考虑了临床环境中导致疼痛治疗不足的因素,以及近期未能从伦理角度处理有问题的临床做法所带来的危害。最后,本文提出了一些建议,以促使生物伦理学家重新关注这一重大问题。

相似文献

1
A legacy of silence: bioethics and the culture of pain.沉默的遗产:生物伦理学与疼痛文化。
J Med Humanit. 1997 Winter;18(4):233-59. doi: 10.1023/a:1025697920944.
2
Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists.我们是专业人士吗?对生物伦理学家社会角色的批判性审视。
Daedalus. 1999 Fall;128(4):253-74.
3
Bioethics and law: a developmental perspective.生物伦理学与法律:一种发展视角。
Bioethics. 1997 Apr;11(2):91-114. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00048.
4
Defining the role of the physician: medical education, tradition and the legal process.界定医生的角色:医学教育、传统与法律程序。
Houst Law Rev. 1981 May;18(4):779-99.
5
Courting death: assisted suicide, doctors, and the law.自寻死路:协助自杀、医生与法律
Commentary. 1996 Dec;102(6):17-29.
6
Ethics consultation as moral engagement.作为道德参与的伦理咨询
Bioethics. 1991 Jan;5(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00143.x.
7
Physician-assisted suicide: appellate court rulings.医生协助自杀:上诉法院裁决
Issues (St Louis Mo). 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):1-8.
8
Ethical issues and legalizing physician-assisted suicide.伦理问题与医生协助自杀合法化
Issues (St Louis Mo). 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):1-8.
9
Anthropology and bioethics.人类学与生物伦理学。
Med Anthropol Q. 1992 Mar;6(1):49-73. doi: 10.1525/maq.1992.6.1.02a00040.
10
Contemporary bioethics and the demise of modern medicine.当代生物伦理学与现代医学的衰落。
Bioeth News. 1989 Jan;8(2):6-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351159.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.农场动物的疼痛管理:聚焦于牛、羊和猪。
Animals (Basel). 2021 May 21;11(6):1483. doi: 10.3390/ani11061483.
2
Racial Bias in the US Opioid Epidemic: A Review of the History of Systemic Bias and Implications for Care.美国阿片类药物流行中的种族偏见:系统性偏见历史回顾及其对医疗的影响
Cureus. 2018 Dec 14;10(12):e3733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3733.
3
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.探究慢性疼痛中的信任、专业知识与认知不公正

本文引用的文献

1
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案
Wests Supreme Court Report. 1990 Jun 25;110:2841-92.
2
The quality of mercy. Effective pain treatments already exist. Why aren't doctors using them?怜悯的品质。有效的疼痛治疗方法已然存在。医生们为何不采用呢?
US News World Rep. 1997 Mar 17;122(10):54-7, 60, 62 passim.
3
The goals of medicine. Setting new priorities.医学的目标。设定新的优先事项。
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
Vulnerability in clinical research with patients in pain: a risk analysis.针对疼痛患者的临床研究中的脆弱性:一项风险分析。
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Spring;37(1):59-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00351.x.
5
When race matters: disagreement in pain perception between patients and their physicians in primary care.当种族因素起作用时:初级保健中患者与医生在疼痛感知上的分歧
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 May;99(5):532-8.
6
The undertreatment of pain: scientific, clinical, cultural, and philosophical factors.疼痛治疗不足:科学、临床、文化和哲学因素。
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):277-88. doi: 10.1023/a:1012057403159.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Nov-Dec;26(6):S1-27.
4
Government regulatory influences on opioid prescribing and their impact on the treatment of pain of nonmalignant origin.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996 May;11(5):287-98. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(95)00203-0.
5
Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.临终决策:关于维持生命治疗的专业观点
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):14-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.14.
6
Improving care near the end of life. Why is it so hard?改善临终关怀。为何如此困难?
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1634-6.
7
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.一项改善重症住院患者护理的对照试验。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究(SUPPORT)。SUPPORT主要研究者。
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591-8.
8
The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine.痛苦的本质与医学的目标。
N Engl J Med. 1982 Mar 18;306(11):639-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198203183061104.
9
Pain and the ethics of pain management.
Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(6):515-23. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90010-8.
10
Undertreatment of medical inpatients with narcotic analgesics.住院患者使用麻醉性镇痛药治疗不足。
Ann Intern Med. 1973 Feb;78(2):173-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-173.