Waitzkin H
Am J Public Health. 1979 Dec;69(12):1260-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.12.1260.
Cost containment efforts will fail if they continue to ignore the structural relationships between health care costs and private profit in capitalist society. The recent history of coronary care shows that apparent irrationalities of health policy make sense from the standpoint of capitalist profit structure. Coronary care units (CCUs) gained wide acceptance, despite high costs. Studies of CCU effectiveness, using random controlled trials and epidemiologic techniques, do not show a consistent advantage of CCUs over non-intensive ward care or simple rest at home. From a Marxian perspective, the proliferation of CCUs and similar innovations is a complex historical process that includes initiatives by industrial corporations, cooperation by clinical investigators at academic medical centers, support by private philanthropies linked to corporate interests, intervention by state agencies, and changes in the health care labor force. Cost-effective methodology obscures the profit motive as a basic source of high costs and ineffective practices. Health-policy alternatives curtailing corporate involvement in medicine would reduce costs by restricting profit.
如果成本控制措施继续忽视资本主义社会中医疗保健成本与私人利润之间的结构关系,那么这些措施将会失败。冠心病护理的近期历史表明,从资本主义利润结构的角度来看,卫生政策表面上的不合理之处其实是有道理的。尽管成本高昂,但冠心病监护病房(CCU)还是得到了广泛认可。使用随机对照试验和流行病学技术对冠心病监护病房有效性的研究并未表明,冠心病监护病房相对于非重症监护病房护理或在家简单休息具有持续的优势。从马克思主义的角度来看,冠心病监护病房及类似创新的扩散是一个复杂的历史过程,其中包括工业公司的倡议、学术医疗中心临床研究人员的合作、与企业利益相关的私人慈善机构的支持、国家机构的干预以及医疗保健劳动力的变化。具有成本效益的方法掩盖了利润动机,而利润动机是高成本和无效做法的一个基本根源。减少企业对医疗行业参与的卫生政策选择将通过限制利润来降低成本。