Abortion--State Budget Act restricting circumstances under which public funds would be authorized to pay for abortions for Medi-Cal recipients held unconstitutional--Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal. 3d 252, 625 P. 2d 779, 172 Cal. Rptr. 866 (1981).
作者信息
Harris Debra J
出版信息
J Fam Law. 1981;20(2):345-51.
PMID:11655656
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
2
Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: abortion funding restrictions as an unconstitutional condition.捍卫生殖权利委员会诉迈尔斯案：堕胎资金限制属于违宪条件。
Calif Law Rev. 1982 Jul;70(4):978-1013.
3
Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev. 1978;9(2):361-419.
4
Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev. 1982 Summer;12(3):691-716.
5
The denial of Medi-Cal funds for abortion: an establishment of religion.拒绝为堕胎提供医疗补助资金：确立宗教信仰。 （不过该译文从正常语义逻辑看可能不太准确，原英文表述比较奇怪，推测原文或许有误，正确可能是“The denial of Medi-Cal funds for abortion: a violation of the Establishment Clause.”，意为“拒绝为堕胎提供医疗补助资金：违反政教分离条款” ） 仅按要求翻译给出此译文 。
Gold Gate Law Rev. 1978;9(2):421-49.
6
Doe v. Percy.多伊诉珀西案
Fed Suppl. 1979 Sep 13;476:324-34.
7
Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.菲舍尔诉公共福利部
Atl Report. 1984 Mar 9;482:1137-48.
8
Women of the State of Minnesota v. Gomez.明尼苏达州诉戈麦斯案
North West Rep Second Ser. 1995 Dec 15;542:17-42.
9
Amendment No. 336.
Congr Rec (Dly Ed). 1975 Apr 10;121(55):S5708-30.
10
Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers.捍卫生殖权利委员会诉迈尔斯案
Wests Calif Report. 1979 May 29;156:73-91.
Zotero 插件