Rumpelstiltskin revisited: the inalienable rights of surrogate mothers.
出版信息
Harv Law Rev. 1986 Jun;99(8):1936-55.
PMID:11655817
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rumpelstiltskin revisited: the inalienable rights of surrogate mothers.重温《侏儒怪》：代孕母亲的不可剥夺权利
Harv Law Rev. 1986 Jun;99(8):1936-55.
2
Re-expressing parenthood.重新表达为人父母的身份。
Yale Law J. 1988 Dec;98(2):293-340.
3
A case against pregnancy contracts: embodied selves, liberal theory and the law.
Politics Life Sci. 1990 Feb;8(2):216-20. doi: 10.1017/s0730938400009771.
4
In the matter of Baby M: rejudged.
Reprod Genet Eng. 1988;1(2):175-81.
5
Surrogate gestator: a new and honorable profession.代孕者：一种新兴且体面的职业。
Marquette Law Rev. 1993 Summer;76(4):675-99.
6
The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis.
Tenn Law Rev. 1994 Winter;61(2):609-46.
7
Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy.禁止向代孕母亲付款：徒劳无功与宪法赋予的隐私权
John Marshall Law Rev. 1987 Summer;20(4):715-45.
8
Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case.隐私、代孕与“宝宝M”案。
Georgetown Law J. 1988 Jun;76(5):1759-92.
9
10
Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?界定个人隐私的边界：在强制进行治疗性胎儿手术方面是否存在家长式利益考量？
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1994 Spring;88(3):1157-99.
Zotero 插件