Commentary: no more jurisdiction over Jehovah.
作者信息
Goldblatt Ann Dudley
出版信息
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Summer;27(2):190-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01450.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: no more jurisdiction over Jehovah.
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Summer;27(2):190-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01450.x.
2
Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Summer;27(2):171-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01449.x.
3
Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1987 May;1(5):1-8.
4
Two patients or one? Problems of consent in obstetrics.
Med Law Int. 1993;1(1):97-112. doi: 10.1177/096853329300100107.
5
Beyond abortion: refusal of caesarean section.
Bioethics. 1989 Apr;3(2):106-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00332.x.
6
Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
Hastings Law J. 1986 May;37(5):703-63.
7
Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Harv Womens Law J. 1987 Spring;10:9-58.
8
The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Calif Law Rev. 1986 Dec;74(6):1951-2030.
9
Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
Health Prog. 1992 Sep;73(3):18, 20-27.
10
Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
Ga State Univ Law Rev. 1994 May;10(4):615-89.
Zotero 插件