相似文献
1
Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Summer;27(2):171-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01449.x.
2
Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
North KY Law Rev. 1983;10(2):281-304.
3
Commentary: no more jurisdiction over Jehovah.
J Law Med Ethics. 1999 Summer;27(2):190-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01450.x.
4
Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus.
Christ Century. 1994 Mar 9;111(8):244-5.
5
Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
Ga State Univ Law Rev. 1994 May;10(4):615-89.
6
Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1991;5(1):1-16.
7
Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1987 May;1(5):1-8.
8
Ethical triumph, or surgical rape?
Solicit J. 1993 Nov 26;137(45):1182-3.
9
Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
Hastings Law J. 1986 May;37(5):703-63.
10
Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections.
BMJ. 1994 Jan 22;308(6923):224. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6923.224.
Zotero 插件