Physician-assisted suicide: two moral arguments.
作者信息
Thomson Judith Jarvis
出版信息
Ethics. 1999 Apr;109(3):497-518. doi: 10.1086/233919.
DOI:10.1086/233919
PMID:11657609
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Physician-assisted suicide: two moral arguments.
Ethics. 1999 Apr;109(3):497-518. doi: 10.1086/233919.
2
Is the pendulum of public opinion swinging in favour of euthanasia?
CMAJ. 1995 Mar 15;152(6):956-8.
3
Where docs draw the line.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 Sep-Oct;23(5):3-4.
4
Why doctors should not kill.
Christ Med Soc J. 1993 Spring;24(1):10-4.
5
Active vs. passive euthanasia: why keep the distinction?
Trial. 1993 Mar;29(3):32-34, 36-38.
6
Physician-assisted lethal injection vs. the plastic bag: will euthanasia legislation ever come? A comparison of standards in the Netherlands and the United States.
Temple Int Comp Law J. 1992 Fall;6(2):365-401.
7
Physician involvement in life-ending practices.
Seattle Univ Law Rev. 1995 Spring;18(3):531-44.
8
Physician-assisted suicide: reflections of a young doctor.
America (NY). 1996;175(5):13-6.
9
A Dutch treat.
Hum Life Rev. 1990 Fall;16(4):7-26.
10
Physician-assisted suicide in the courts: moral equivalence, double effect, and clinical practice.
Minn Law Rev. 1998 Apr;82(4):939-63.
引用本文的文献
1
Lifespan extension and the doctrine of double effect.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Jun;34(3):207-26. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9257-1.
2
The principle of double effect as a guide for medical decision-making.
Med Health Care Philos. 2008 Dec;11(4):465-73. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9128-0. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
Zotero 插件