Constitutional law--can a "life advocate" impair the constitutional right to reject life-prolonging medical treatment?--In re Jobes, 210 N.J.Super. 543, 510 A.2d 133.
作者信息
Armstrong Allan
出版信息
Cumberland Law Rev. 1986;17(2):553-68.
PMID:11658968
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
N Y Times Web. 1987 Jun 25:A1, B12.
3
Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Rutgers Law J. 1988 Summer;19(4):999-1028.
4
The Nancy Cruzan case.
Midwest Med Ethics. 1989 Winter-Spring;5(1-2):2-31.
5
Gray v. Romeo.
Issues Law Med. 1989 Spring;4(4):535-40.
6
In re Jobes.
Atl Report. 1987 Jun 24;529:434-65.
7
Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Issues Law Med. 1986 Nov;2(3):221-34.
8
From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Humane Med. 1992 Apr;8(2):122-31.
9
Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Rutgers Law Rev. 1985 Spring;37(3):543-77.
10
Is there a constitutional right to die?
Euthan Rev. 1986 Summer;1(2):138-50.
Zotero 插件