• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如果我仅仅是我的基因,那我是什么?基因本质主义及一种犹太式回应。

If I am only my genes, what am I? Genetic essentialism and a Jewish response.

作者信息

Wolpe Paul Root

出版信息

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997 Sep;7(3):213-30. doi: 10.1353/ken.1997.0027.

DOI:10.1353/ken.1997.0027
PMID:11660355
Abstract

With the advent of the Genetic Age comes a unique new set of problems and ethical decisions. There is a tendency to take the scientific developments presented by modern genetics at face value, as if the science itself were value-neutral and not influenced by cultural and religious images. One example of the fallout of the Genetic Age is the development of a "genetic self," the idea that our essential selfhood lies in our genes. It is important to understand the assumptions of the Genetic Age, the development of genetic selfhood, and the broader cultural trends and assumptions that underlie modern genetic thinking. It is equally important, however, to shape a reaction to the concept of a genetic self. Judaism has long carried on a unique discussion about the nature of selfhood in different times and places and about the relation of the corporeal self to the essential self. Insights from Judaism therefore may help to craft a reaction to the modern genetic self that incorporates the best of modern genetics as well as the integrity of a more transcendent selfhood.

摘要

随着基因时代的到来,出现了一系列独特的新问题和伦理抉择。人们往往直接接受现代遗传学所呈现的科学进展,仿佛科学本身是价值中立的,不受文化和宗教观念的影响。基因时代的一个后果是“基因自我”的出现,即认为我们的本质自我存在于基因之中。理解基因时代的假设、基因自我的发展,以及构成现代基因思维基础的更广泛的文化趋势和假设非常重要。然而,对基因自我的概念形成一种回应同样重要。长期以来,犹太教一直在不同的时间和地点对自我本质的性质以及肉体自我与本质自我的关系进行独特的探讨。因此,来自犹太教的见解可能有助于形成一种对现代基因自我的回应,这种回应既融合了现代遗传学的精华,又兼顾了更具超越性的自我本质的完整性。

相似文献

1
If I am only my genes, what am I? Genetic essentialism and a Jewish response.如果我仅仅是我的基因,那我是什么?基因本质主义及一种犹太式回应。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997 Sep;7(3):213-30. doi: 10.1353/ken.1997.0027.
2
On Judaism and genes: a response to Paul Root Wolpe.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Jun;9(2):159-65. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0008.
3
Reply to Barbara Pfeffer Billauer's "On Judaism and genes.对芭芭拉·普费弗·比劳尔的《论犹太教与基因》的回应
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Jun;9(2):167-74. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0015.
4
Human cloning and genetic manipulation: some theological and ethical issues.人类克隆与基因操纵:一些神学和伦理问题。
Stud Christ Ethics. 1999;12(2):1-16. doi: 10.1177/095394689901200201.
5
The jurisprudence of genetics.遗传学的法理学
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 1992 Mar;45(2):313-48.
6
The Future of DNA: an international conference about presuppositions in science and expectations in society.
Bull Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;No. 122:21-3.
7
Religion and the body in medical research.医学研究中的宗教与身体
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):275-305. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0019.
8
Anxiety and genetic manipulation: a sociological view.
Perspect Biol Med. 1998 Summer;41(4):483-90. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1998.0016.
9
Prospects for "genetic therapy" -- can a person benefit from being altered?“基因治疗”的前景——人能从基因改变中获益吗?
Bioethics. 1991 Oct;5(4):275-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00168.x.
10
The ethics of the economics of patenting the human genome.人类基因组专利经济的伦理问题。
J Bus Ethics. 1998 Nov;17(15):1679-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1006031921756.

引用本文的文献

1
From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification.从善良到美丽:改变人类种系遗传修饰的形象。
Bioethics. 2022 Jun;36(5):556-568. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12913. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
2
Can you keep a (genetic) secret? The genetic privacy movement.你能保守(基因)秘密吗?基因隐私运动。
J Genet Couns. 2004 Aug;13(4):273-91. doi: 10.1023/b:jogc.0000035522.58496.c8.
3
The geneticization of diagnostics.诊断的基因化
Med Health Care Philos. 2006;9(2):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-5292-7.
4
Human gene patents: core issues in a multi-layered debate.人类基因专利:多层次辩论中的核心问题
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(2):211-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1011432614563.