Brethauer S A, Murray J D, Hatter D G, Reeves T R, Hemp J R, Bergan J J
Division of Vascular Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, CA 92134-5000, USA.
Vasc Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;35(1):51-8. doi: 10.1177/153857440103500109.
There is no consensus as to the single best approach to the treatment of varicose veins. There has been a trend toward less invasive procedures to reduce the number of incisions and provide more selective ablation of varicosities. Ultimately, therapeutic decisions have depended on surgeon preference and the patient population. The active duty military population presents a unique challenge in the treatment of varicose veins. This mobile and active population requires a treatment method that provides maximum relief with the lowest possible morbidity and rapid recovery. The authors previously reported their experience with 104 patients who underwent saphenofemoral ligation combined with perforator point ligation and staged sclerotherapy. This group was compared to 103 patients who underwent saphenofemoral ligation, point perforator ligation, and stab avulsion phlebectomy as a single procedure. Follow-up for the sclerotherapy group included patient satisfaction surveys and documentation of recurrent varicosities. All ambulatory phlebectomy patients responded positively with respect to symptomatic and cosmetic results. Overall satisfaction was favorable and there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the ambulatory phlebectomy and sclerotherapy groups. Twelve per cent of the sclerotherapy patients developed true recurrences or new varicosities compared to 11% in the ambulatory phlebectomy group. The most common complication was superficial thrombophlebitis (20% ambulatory phlebectomy, 16% sclerotherapy) which was mild in all cases. All but three patients in the ambulatory phlebectomy group returned to work within 7 days and 75% returned to full duty within 72 hours. Completion of therapy was accomplished in a much shorter period for the ambulatory phlebectomy group. Overall patient satisfaction was achieved for both ambulatory phlebectomy and sclerotherapy patients. Completion of therapy was achieved in a shorter period with fewer clinic visits in the ambulatory phlebectomy group and this has become our procedure of choice for active duty military patients.
对于静脉曲张的最佳治疗方法,目前尚无共识。近年来,治疗趋势倾向于采用侵入性较小的手术,以减少切口数量,并更有针对性地消除静脉曲张。最终,治疗方案的选择取决于外科医生的偏好和患者群体。现役军人在静脉曲张治疗方面面临着独特的挑战。这个流动性强且活跃的群体需要一种治疗方法,既能最大程度缓解症状,又能将发病率降至最低,并实现快速康复。作者此前报告了他们对104例接受大隐静脉高位结扎联合交通支结扎及分期硬化治疗患者的经验。将该组患者与103例接受大隐静脉高位结扎、交通支结扎及点状剥脱静脉切除术的患者进行了比较。硬化治疗组的随访包括患者满意度调查和复发性静脉曲张的记录。所有门诊静脉切除术患者对症状和美容效果均给予了积极反馈。总体满意度良好,门诊静脉切除术组和硬化治疗组在患者满意度方面无显著差异。硬化治疗组有12%的患者出现真正的复发或新的静脉曲张,而门诊静脉切除术组为11%。最常见的并发症是浅静脉血栓形成(门诊静脉切除术组为20%,硬化治疗组为16%),所有病例症状均较轻。门诊静脉切除术组除3例患者外,其余均在7天内恢复工作,75%的患者在72小时内恢复全职工作。门诊静脉切除术组的治疗完成时间要短得多。门诊静脉切除术患者和硬化治疗患者总体上均实现了患者满意度。门诊静脉切除术组治疗完成时间更短,门诊就诊次数更少,这已成为我们治疗现役军人患者的首选方法。