Conformational Preference and Donor Atom Interaction Leading to Hexacoordination vs Pentacoordination in Bicyclic Tetraoxyphosphoranes(1).

New bicyclic tetraoxyphosphoranes all containing a six-membered oxaphosphorinane ring, C(6)H(8)(CH(2)O)(2)P(OC(12)H(8))(OXyl) (1), (C(6)H(4)O)(2)P(OC(12)H(8))(OXyl) (2), CH(2)(t-Bu)(2)C(6)H(2)OP(OC(12)H(8))(OXyl) (3), O(2)S(t-Bu)MeC(6)H(2)OP(OC(12)H(8))(OXyl) (4), and S(t-Bu)MeC(6)H(2)OP(OC(12)H(8))(OXyl) (5), were synthesized by the oxidative addition reaction of the cyclic phosphine P(OC(12)H(8))(OXyl) (6) with an appropriate diol in the presence of N-chlorodiisopropylamine. X-ray analysis revealed trigonal bipyramidal (TBP) geometries for 1-4 where the dioxa ring varied in size from six- to eight-membered. With a sulfur donor atom as part of an eight-membered ring in place of a potential oxygen donor atom of a sulfone group as in 4, the X-ray study of 5 showed the formation of a hexacoordinated structure via a P-S interaction. Ring constraints are evaluated to give an order of conformational flexibility associated with the (TBP) tetraoxyphosphoranes 4 > 3 approximately 1 > 2 which parallels the degree of shielding from (31)P NMR chemical shifts: 4 > 3 > 1 > 2. The six- and seven-membered dioxa rings in 1 and 2, respectively, are positioned at axial-equatorial sites, whereas the eight-membered dioxa ring in 3 and 4 occupies diequatorial sites of a TBP. V-T (1)H NMR data give barriers to xylyl group rotation about the C-OXyl bond. The geometry of 5 is located along a coordinate from square pyramidal toward octahedral to the extent of 60.7%. Achieving hexacoordination in bicyclic tetraoxyphosphoranes of reduced electrophilicity relative to bicyclic pentaoxyphosphoranes appears to be dependent on the presence of a sufficiently strong donor atom.