Wandt H, Ehninger G, Gallmeier W M
5th Medical Department and Institute of Medical Oncology and Hamatology, Nüremberg, Germany.
Oncologist. 2001;6(5):446-50. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-5-446.
There is an increasing demand for platelet transfusions due to intensive chemotherapy and blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of hematologic and oncologic diseases. There has been a long-lasting debate over whether the traditional threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusion of 20,000/microl is really necessary to prevent hemorrhagic complications. During the last 10 years several studies with more than 1,000 patients together have proven the safety of a platelet transfusion trigger of 10,000/microl or even lower when patients are clinically stable without active bleeding. This experience has been mostly gathered in patients with acute leukemia. But this stringent platelet transfusion policy can be used also after blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation. In stable patients with aplastic anemia and myelodysplasia, prophylactic transfusions should be replaced in most patients by a therapeutic transfusion strategy. Such restrictive platelet transfusion strategies decrease the risk of infectious disease transmission, immunization, and febrile transfusion reactions. Besides reduced hospital visits and a shorter hospital stay for the patients, the costs for platelet transfusions are lowered by 20%-30% compared with traditional transfusion strategies. The decision to administer platelet transfusions should incorporate individual clinical characteristics of the patients and not simply be a reflexive reaction to the platelet count. Further clinical studies are needed to answer the still open question of whether patients with acute leukemia should also be transfused therapeutically rather than prophylactically when they are in stable condition without signs of active bleeding.
由于强化化疗以及用于治疗血液学和肿瘤学疾病的血液干细胞或骨髓移植,对血小板输注的需求日益增加。关于预防性血小板输注的传统阈值20,000/微升对于预防出血并发症是否真的必要,一直存在长期争论。在过去10年中,几项涉及1000多名患者的研究共同证明,当患者临床稳定且无活动性出血时,血小板输注触发阈值为10,000/微升甚至更低是安全的。这种经验大多来自急性白血病患者。但这种严格的血小板输注策略在血液干细胞和骨髓移植后也可采用。在再生障碍性贫血和骨髓增生异常综合征的稳定患者中,大多数患者的预防性输血应被治疗性输血策略取代。这种限制性血小板输注策略可降低传染病传播、免疫和发热性输血反应的风险。除了减少患者的医院就诊次数和缩短住院时间外,与传统输血策略相比,血小板输注成本降低了20%-30%。决定是否进行血小板输注应考虑患者的个体临床特征,而不仅仅是对血小板计数的本能反应。对于急性白血病患者在病情稳定且无活动性出血迹象时是否也应进行治疗性而非预防性输血这一仍未解决的问题,还需要进一步的临床研究来回答。