Byrd J W
Nashville Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Clin Sports Med. 2001 Oct;20(4):703-31.
Hip arthroscopy is an effective technique. It can be performed successfully either supine or in the lateral position, but there appear to be modest advantages of the supine approach. Arthroscopy offers a less invasive alternative to arthrotomy for traditionally recognized forms of hip pathology, such as loose bodies or impinging osteophytes. Arthroscopy also offers a method of treatment for many conditions (including labral tears, acute articular injuries, and damage to the ligamentum teres) that previously went unrecognized and untreated. In the past, these patients were simply resigned to living within the constraints of their symptoms. Several dictums about hip arthroscopy must be acknowledged. First, the key to a successful outcome lies in proper patient selection. A technically well-executed procedure will fail when performed for the wrong reason, or when the outcome fails to meet the patient's expectations. Second, the patient must be properly positioned for the procedure to go well. Poor positioning will assure a difficult procedure. Third, simply gaining access to the hip joint is not an outstanding technical accomplishment. The paramount issue is accessing the joint in as atraumatic a fashion as possible. Due to its constrained architecture and dense soft tissue envelope, the potential for inadvertent iatrogenic scope trauma is significant and, perhaps unavoidable to some extent. Therefore, every reasonable step should be taken to keep this concern to a minimum. Perform the procedure as carefully as possible and be certain that it is being performed for the right reason. After accessing the joint, the techniques of operative arthroscopy for the hip employ existing strategies established in other joints. Because of the restraints imposed by the hip, however, technical deficiencies may be more apparent.
髋关节镜检查是一种有效的技术。它可以在仰卧位或侧卧位成功进行,但仰卧入路似乎有一定的优势。对于传统上公认的髋关节病变形式,如游离体或撞击性骨赘,关节镜检查为切开手术提供了一种侵入性较小的替代方法。关节镜检查还为许多以前未被认识和治疗的病症(包括盂唇撕裂、急性关节损伤和圆韧带损伤)提供了一种治疗方法。过去,这些患者只能无奈地忍受症状的困扰。关于髋关节镜检查有几条原则必须牢记。首先,成功治疗的关键在于正确选择患者。如果手术实施的原因错误,或者治疗结果未达到患者的期望,那么即使技术上执行得很好的手术也会失败。其次,患者必须处于正确的体位,手术才能顺利进行。体位不当肯定会导致手术困难。第三,仅仅进入髋关节并不是一项了不起的技术成就。最重要的问题是以尽可能无创的方式进入关节。由于髋关节结构受限且软组织包膜致密,无意中造成医源性器械损伤的可能性很大,而且在某种程度上可能是不可避免的。因此,应采取一切合理措施将这种风险降至最低。尽可能小心地进行手术,并确保手术实施的原因正确。进入关节后,髋关节手术关节镜技术采用在其他关节中已确立的现有策略。然而,由于髋关节的限制,技术缺陷可能会更加明显。