Dohmen K, Shirahama M, Shigematsu H, Miyamoto Y, Torii Y, Irie K, Ishibashi H
Saga Prefectural Hospital Koseikan, Saga, Japan.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1409-15.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization followed by percutaneous ethanol injection in patients with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma by comparing the use of this combined regimen with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone.
Six hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma lesions observed from Jan 1989 to Dec 1999 (11 years) at the Internal Medicine Department, Saga Prefectural Hospital Koseikan were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The series included 120 patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the largest of which were greater than 3 cm in largest dimension. Fifty-two patients underwent a single transcatheter arterial chemoembolization followed by percutaneous ethanol injection, which were compared with 68 patients treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone. Both groups of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma did not differ regarding the base-line characteristics. The overall survival rates and recurrence ratio of initially treated lesions were compared in both groups.
On overall survival rates by the Kaplan-Meier method, three- and five-year survival in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection group (59.0%, 32.1%) proved to be significantly longer than those in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group (27.1%, 17.0%). In addition, during the follow-up local recurrence in the combination group (23.1%) was significantly lower than that in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group (50.0%).
The combined treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection proved to be more effective and safer. Furthermore, a lower incidence of local recurrence was observed than transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone which resulted in an increased survival of the patients associated with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma lesions.
背景/目的:本研究旨在通过比较经动脉化疗栓塞联合经皮乙醇注射与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞在不可切除的大肝细胞癌患者中的应用效果,来评估联合治疗方案的有效性。
回顾性纳入了1989年1月至1999年12月(11年)在佐贺县立小关医院内科观察到的631例连续性肝细胞癌患者。该系列包括120例不可切除的大肝细胞癌患者,其中最大的肿瘤最大直径大于3 cm。52例患者接受了单次经动脉化疗栓塞,随后进行经皮乙醇注射,并与68例仅接受经动脉化疗栓塞治疗的患者进行比较。两组肝细胞癌患者在基线特征方面无差异。比较了两组初始治疗病变的总生存率和复发率。
采用Kaplan-Meier法计算总生存率,经动脉化疗栓塞联合经皮乙醇注射组的3年和5年生存率(59.0%,32.1%)明显长于经动脉化疗栓塞组(27.1%,17.0%)。此外,在随访期间,联合治疗组的局部复发率(23.1%)明显低于经动脉化疗栓塞组(50.0%)。
经动脉化疗栓塞联合经皮乙醇注射的联合治疗被证明更有效、更安全。此外,与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞相比,局部复发率更低,这使得不可切除的大肝细胞癌患者生存率提高。