• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模块化组件置换用于治疗特定患者全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位

Modular component exchange for treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement in selected patients.

作者信息

Toomey S D, Hopper R H, McAuley J P, Engh C A

机构信息

Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, VA 22307, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Oct;83(10):1529-33. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00011.

DOI:10.2106/00004623-200110000-00011
PMID:11679604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exchange of modular components is a treatment option for the correction of recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement. In this study, we reviewed our experience with this technique in order to define patient selection criteria and to report the outcome of treatment.

METHODS

Of 2935 hips treated with primary porous-coated total hip arthroplasty, fourteen (in fourteen patients) that met certain preoperative and intraoperative criteria were treated with modular component exchange because of recurrent hip instability. The primary arthroplasties in these fourteen patients had been performed through a posterior approach. At the revisions, we removed any sources of osseous or soft-tissue impingement that contributed to dislocation. Acceptable stability at the completion of component exchange was defined as stability in maximum flexion, in full extension with external rotation, and in at least 45 degrees of internal rotation with the hip in 90 degrees of flexion and maximum adduction.

RESULTS

One patient was lost to follow-up. At a mean of 5.8 years (range, 2.8 to 11.8 years) after the revision, ten of the remaining thirteen patients had not had a dislocation. Of the three patients in whom the hip dislocated after the modular component exchange, only one had recurrent dislocation; thus, recurrent dislocation was eliminated in twelve of thirteen patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cases, modular component exchange for the treatment of recurrent hip dislocation has a success rate comparable with that of more extensive operations. This method should be considered because it avoids the morbidity associated with revision of well-fixed components. However, to ensure the appropriateness of this surgical option, each patient must be thoroughly evaluated to identify all factors that contribute to instability and adequate intraoperative stability must be achieved.

摘要

背景

模块化组件置换是治疗全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位的一种治疗选择。在本研究中,我们回顾了我们在该技术方面的经验,以确定患者选择标准并报告治疗结果。

方法

在2935例接受初次多孔涂层全髋关节置换术治疗的髋关节中,有14例(14名患者)因复发性髋关节不稳定符合某些术前和术中标准,接受了模块化组件置换。这14例患者的初次关节置换均通过后路进行。在翻修手术中,我们去除了所有导致脱位的骨或软组织撞击源。组件置换完成时可接受的稳定性定义为最大屈曲位、伸直位外旋以及髋关节屈曲90°最大内收位至少45°内旋位时的稳定性。

结果

1例患者失访。翻修术后平均5.8年(范围2.8至11.8年),其余13例患者中有10例未发生脱位。在模块化组件置换后髋关节脱位的3例患者中,只有1例出现复发性脱位;因此,13例患者中有12例消除了复发性脱位。

结论

在特定病例中,模块化组件置换治疗复发性髋关节脱位的成功率与更广泛的手术相当。应考虑采用这种方法,因为它避免了与固定良好的组件翻修相关的并发症。然而,为确保这种手术选择的适宜性,必须对每位患者进行全面评估,以识别所有导致不稳定的因素,并且必须在术中获得足够的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Modular component exchange for treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement in selected patients.模块化组件置换用于治疗特定患者全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Oct;83(10):1529-33. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00011.
2
Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.采用骨水泥型双动髋臼杯治疗复发性脱位的5至13年随访结果
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):513-519. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3343-8. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
3
Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection Is Associated with a High Rate of Dislocation.髋关节置换术后感染的两期翻修与高脱位率相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 20;101(4):322-329. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00124.
4
Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.从髋关节半关节置换术转换为全髋关节置换术后的脱位率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):506-16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00479.
5
Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement.使用超大股骨头治疗全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb;84(2):256-63. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00013.
6
Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?在“更简单”的股骨翻修手术中模块化有好处吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4474-8.
7
Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.意大利的全髋关节置换术不稳定性
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3345-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
Soft tissue reinforcement with a Leeds-Keio artificial ligament in revision surgery for dislocated total hip arthroplasty.在全髋关节置换脱位翻修手术中使用利兹-庆应义塾人工韧带进行软组织强化。
Hip Int. 2018 May;28(3):324-329. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000573. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
High Failure Rate of Modular Exchange With a Specific Design of a Constrained Liner in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.在接受髋关节翻修置换术的高风险患者中,特定设计的限制性衬垫模块化置换失败率较高。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Modular revision for recurrent dislocation of primary or revision total hip arthroplasty.初次或翻修全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位的模块化翻修术。
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Jun;19(4):424-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.077.

引用本文的文献

1
Femoral Head and Liner Exchange in Patients with Atraumatic Dislocation. Results of a Retrospective Study with 6 Years Follow-Up.股骨头和衬垫置换治疗非创伤性脱位患者:一项 6 年随访回顾性研究的结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 1;57(11):1188. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111188.
2
Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Advanced Imaging and Three-Dimensional Modeling Techniques: A Case Series.使用先进成像和三维建模技术治疗全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位:病例系列
HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09704-z. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Awareness of performance on outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty among Dutch orthopedic surgeons: how to improve feedback from arthroplasty registries.
荷兰骨科医生对全髋关节和膝关节置换术后结果表现的认知:如何改善关节置换登记处的反馈。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):54-61. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1827523. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中钛合金模块化股骨柄的中期疗效
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Mar;7(5):92. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.01.34.
5
Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.意大利的全髋关节置换术不稳定性
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3345-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty.双动杯在髋关节半关节置换术复发性脱位治疗中的应用。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Jun;17(2):131-6. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0365-8. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
7
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):410-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2561-7.
8
Instability after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后的不稳定
World J Orthop. 2012 Aug 18;3(8):122-30. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i8.122.
9
Is an algorithmic approach to the treatment of recurrent dislocation after THA effective?对于全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位,采用算法治疗是否有效?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):482-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2101-x.
10
Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.单纯的干骺端模块并不能有效降低髋关节翻修手术中的脱位率。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Dec;10(4):167-71. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0076-0. Epub 2009 Nov 18.