• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“严峻的”现实:自我转诊规则既存在风险也带来机遇。

"Stark" reality: self-referral rule holds risk and opportunity.

作者信息

Lebowitz P H

出版信息

Radiol Manage. 2001 Sep-Oct;23(5):34-9.

PMID:11680255
Abstract

On January 4, 2001, the Health Care Financing Administration (now the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services or CMS) issued Phase I of the final Stark II regulations (Final Rule). The Final Rule implements the Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989 (Stark I), as amended by the Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Stark II), collectively the Stark Law. It is intended to provide more flexibility to providers by interpreting the prohibitions narrowly and the exceptions broadly. Generally, the Stark Law prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity for the provision of "designated health services (DHS)" if the physician (or a member of the physician's immediate family) has a direct or indirect financial relationship with the entity. The Final Rule establishes two principal exceptions to the referral prohibition that apply to both ownership/investment interests and compensation arrangements. The physician service exception permits referrals for DHS that are furnished by a member or physician in the same group practice as the referring physician, or under their supervision. The in-office ancillary services exception permits referral for provision of DHS in the same building in which the referring physician or his group routinely provides the full range of the group's or physician's medical services. The final regulations redefine the prior description of radiology and radiation therapy services subject to Stark II. The principal change is to segregate radiation therapy and supplies from radiology and other imaging services. It is uncertain whether Stark Law enforcement will be a priority under the Bush Administration. Nonetheless, because the Final Rule offers more flexibility than the proposed rule, providers and suppliers should revisit proposed and abandoned arrangements that they believed to be prohibited.

摘要

2001年1月4日,医疗保健财务管理局(现为医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心,即CMS)发布了最终版斯塔克二号法规的第一阶段(最终规则)。该最终规则实施了经1993年《综合预算协调法案》(斯塔克二号)修订的1989年《患者转诊伦理法案》(斯塔克一号),二者统称为斯塔克法案。其目的是通过狭义解释禁令和广义解释例外情况,为医疗服务提供者提供更大的灵活性。一般来说,斯塔克法案禁止医生将医疗保险或医疗补助患者转介给某个实体以提供“指定医疗服务(DHS)”,如果该医生(或其直系亲属)与该实体存在直接或间接的财务关系。最终规则确立了两项适用于所有权/投资权益和薪酬安排的转诊禁令主要例外情况。医生服务例外允许将转诊给与转诊医生在同一集团执业的成员或医生提供的DHS,或在其监督下提供的DHS。办公室内辅助服务例外允许转诊在转诊医生或其集团常规提供其全部医疗服务的同一建筑物内提供DHS。最终法规重新定义了受斯塔克二号约束的放射学和放射治疗服务的先前描述。主要变化是将放射治疗及用品与放射学和其他影像服务区分开来。在布什政府领导下,斯塔克法案的执法是否会成为优先事项尚不确定。尽管如此,由于最终规则比提议规则提供了更大的灵活性,医疗服务提供者和供应商应重新审视他们认为被禁止的提议和已放弃的安排。

相似文献

1
"Stark" reality: self-referral rule holds risk and opportunity.“严峻的”现实:自我转诊规则既存在风险也带来机遇。
Radiol Manage. 2001 Sep-Oct;23(5):34-9.
2
Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;医生向与其存在财务关系的医疗保健实体进行转诊。卫生与公众服务部医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2001 Jan 4;66(3):856-965.
3
Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility.第一阶段的斯塔克二号法规提供了一些灵活性。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2001 Oct;55(10):52-9.
4
Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships--HCFA. Proposed rule.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;医生向与其存在财务关系的医疗保健实体进行转诊——医疗保健财务管理局。拟议规则。
Fed Regist. 1998 Jan 9;63(6):1659-728.
5
Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?医生自荐:《斯塔克 II》第三阶段是最后一程吗?
Pain Physician. 2007 Nov;10(6):725-41.
6
Surfing Stark II: prohibition against self-referrals.
Physician Exec. 1995 Feb;21(2):11-5.
7
Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships.
Mich Health Hosp. 1995 Fall;31(5):34-6.
8
Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations.欺诈与滥用。解读《斯塔克法案II》拟议法规。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Apr;52(4):65-9.
9
Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Manag Care Q. 2002 Winter;10(1):38-46.
10
Phase I of the Stark II final rule.
Mich Health Hosp. 2001 Jul-Aug;37(4):52-3.