Fleischer R C, Perry E A, Muralidharan K, Stevens E E, Wemmer C M
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Conservation and Research Center, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
Evolution. 2001 Sep;55(9):1882-92. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00837.x.
Populations of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) have been reduced in size and become highly fragmented during the past 3,000 to 4,000 years. Historical records reveal elephant dispersal by humans via trade and war. How have these anthropogenic impacts affected genetic variation and structure of Asian elephant populations? We sequenced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to assay genetic variation and phylogeography across much of the Asian elephant's range. Initially we compare cytochrome b sequences (cyt b) between nine Asian and five African elephants and use the fossil-based age of their separation (approximately 5 million years ago) to obtain a rate of about 0.013 (95% CI = 0.011-0.018) corrected sequence divergence per million years. We also assess variation in part of the mtDNA control region (CR) and adjacent tRNA genes in 57 Asian elephants from seven countries (Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia). Asian elephants have typical levels of mtDNA variation, and coalescence analyses suggest their populations were growing in the late Pleistocene. Reconstructed phylogenies reveal two major clades (A and B) differing on average by HKY85/gamma-corrected distances of 0.020 for cyt b and 0.050 for the CR segment (corresponding to a coalescence time based on our cyt b rate of approximately 1.2 million years). Individuals of both major clades exist in all locations but Indonesia and Malaysia. Most elephants from Malaysia and all from Indonesia are in well-supported, basal clades within clade A. thus supporting their status as evolutionarily significant units (ESUs). The proportion of clade A individuals decreases to the north, which could result from retention and subsequent loss of ancient lineages in long-term stable populations or, perhaps more likely, via recent mixing of two expanding populations that were isolated in the mid-Pleistocene. The distribution of clade A individuals appears to have been impacted by human trade in elephants among Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and India, and the subspecies and ESU statuses of Sri Lankan elephants are not supported by molecular data.
在过去的3000至4000年里,亚洲象(Elephas maximus)的种群数量减少且分布高度分散。历史记录显示,人类通过贸易和战争导致大象扩散。这些人为影响是如何影响亚洲象种群的遗传变异和结构的呢?我们对线粒体DNA(mtDNA)进行了测序,以分析亚洲象分布范围内大部分地区的遗传变异和系统地理学。最初,我们比较了9头亚洲象和5头非洲象的细胞色素b序列(cyt b),并利用基于化石的它们的分化时间(约500万年前)得出每百万年约0.013(95%可信区间=0.011 - 0.018)的校正序列分歧率。我们还评估了来自七个国家(斯里兰卡、印度、尼泊尔、缅甸、泰国、马来西亚和印度尼西亚)的57头亚洲象的线粒体DNA控制区(CR)部分及相邻tRNA基因的变异情况。亚洲象具有典型水平的线粒体DNA变异,群体分析表明它们的种群在更新世晚期有所增长。重建的系统发育显示出两个主要分支(A和B),细胞色素b的HKY85/伽马校正距离平均差异为0.020,CR片段为0.050(根据我们的细胞色素b速率,这对应于约120万年的群体合并时间)。两个主要分支的个体在除印度尼西亚和马来西亚之外的所有地区都有存在。来自马来西亚的大多数大象以及所有来自印度尼西亚的大象都位于分支A中得到充分支持的基部类群中,因此支持它们作为具有进化意义单元(ESUs)的地位。分支A个体的比例向北递减,这可能是由于古老谱系在长期稳定种群中的保留及随后的丧失造成的,或者更有可能是由于两个在更新世中期隔离的不断扩张的种群最近发生了混合。分支A个体的分布似乎受到了缅甸、斯里兰卡和印度之间大象贸易的影响,并且分子数据不支持斯里兰卡象的亚种和具有进化意义单元的地位。