• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Everyone is still on welfare: the role of redistribution in social policy.

作者信息

Abramovitz M

机构信息

Hunter College School of Social Work, 129 East 79th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Soc Work. 2001 Oct;46(4):297-308. doi: 10.1093/sw/46.4.297.

DOI:10.1093/sw/46.4.297
PMID:11682971
Abstract

Most people have an inaccurate assessment of who is "on welfare." Two decades have passed since Social Work published the original version of this article, which applied Titmuss's framework of a three-tiered social welfare system and showed that nearly "everyone is on welfare." Based on new data and a more in-depth analysis, this article re-examines who benefits from and who pays for social, fiscal, and corporate welfare and concludes that all three welfare systems continue to serve and to favor the middle class, wealthy households, and large corporations. Social workers can work to transform the system from one that rewards power and privilege to one that ensures distributive justice for all.

摘要

相似文献

1
Everyone is still on welfare: the role of redistribution in social policy.
Soc Work. 2001 Oct;46(4):297-308. doi: 10.1093/sw/46.4.297.
2
Public social welfare expenditures, fiscal year 1989.1989财政年度公共社会福利支出
Soc Secur Bull. 1992 Summer;55(2):61-8.
3
Drug use among welfare recipients in the United States.美国福利领取者中的药物使用情况。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000 May;26(2):335-42. doi: 10.1081/ada-100100609.
4
Federalism and social justice: implications for social work.联邦制与社会正义:对社会工作的影响
Soc Work. 2002 Jul;47(3):201-8. doi: 10.1093/sw/47.3.201.
5
Older people's experience of proactive welfare rights advice: qualitative study of a South Asian community.老年人对积极主动的福利权利建议的体验:对一个南亚社区的定性研究
Ethn Health. 2009 Feb;14(1):5-25. doi: 10.1080/13557850802056455.
6
A welfare trap? The duration and dynamics of social assistance use among lone mothers in Canada.福利陷阱?加拿大单亲母亲社会救助使用的持续时间和动态。
Can Rev Sociol. 2009 Aug;46(3):179-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618x.2009.01211.x.
7
Does leaving welfare improve health? Evidence for Germany.离开福利制度会改善健康状况吗?来自德国的证据。
Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):484-504. doi: 10.1002/hec.1615.
8
How safe is the safety net for poor children?贫困儿童的安全保障有多安全?
Soc Work Res. 1996 Dec;20(4):238-54. doi: 10.1093/swr/20.4.238.
9
Private social welfare expenditures, 1972-87.1972年至1987年的私人社会福利支出。
Soc Secur Bull. 1989 Nov;52(11):18-26.
10
Reducing welfare benefits: consequences for adequacy of and eligibility for benefits.削减福利金:对福利金充足性和资格的影响。
Soc Work. 2000 Jul;45(4):300-11. doi: 10.1093/sw/45.4.300.