Maggio D, Ubaldi E, Simonelli G, Cenci S, Pedone C, Cherubini A
Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Via Eugubina, Italy.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2001 Jun;68(6):337-41. doi: 10.1007/s002230001212. Epub 2001 Apr 30.
Hip fracture may cause and/or complicate institutionalization. We undertook this study to define its overall prevalence among the residents of four nursing homes in Central Italy as well as its latency and impact on mobility when it occurred within institutions. We also performed a case control analysis with the aim of identifying potential risk factors for hip fracture in nursing home. Among the 211 residents (160 women, mean age 82.2 +/- 9.29 years, and 51 men, mean age 77.1 +/- 8.9 years), 42 were hip fracture cases, with a prevalence of almost 20%, and a female/male ratio of 6/1.23 fractures preceded institutionalization; of these 19 (17 females and 2 males) occurred within the nursing homes (mean age 83.2 +/- 6.3 years). The average interval between institutionalization and fracture was 74.2 months. The impact of hip fracture on mobility was relevant. The percentage of residents ambulating autonomously fell from 95% to 32% among those who had fractured. Fractured subjects were characterized by worse mobility and function than unfractured subjects, while comorbidity, cognitive functions, and use of psychotropic drugs were similar. Prefracture mobility of fractured subjects was better than that of age-and sex-matched residents who had never fractured their hip. Regarding hip fracture in our nursing home population we can conclude that (1) hip fracture is one of the main causes of institutionalization; (2) in most cases hip fracture occurred late in the course of the nursing home stay; (3) the functional impact of the fracture was relevant when it occurred in institutions. We also suggest that preserved mobility may represent an additional risk factor for hip fracture in nursing homes.
髋部骨折可能导致机构养老并使其复杂化。我们开展这项研究,旨在确定意大利中部四家养老院居民中髋部骨折的总体患病率,以及骨折发生在机构内时的潜伏期及其对行动能力的影响。我们还进行了病例对照分析,以确定养老院中髋部骨折的潜在风险因素。在211名居民中(160名女性,平均年龄82.2±9.29岁,51名男性,平均年龄77.1±8.9岁),42例为髋部骨折病例,患病率近20%,女性/男性比例为6/1。23例骨折发生在机构养老之前;其中19例(17名女性和2名男性)发生在养老院(平均年龄83.2±6.3岁)。机构养老与骨折之间的平均间隔时间为74.2个月。髋部骨折对行动能力的影响很大。骨折者中自主行走的居民比例从95%降至32%。骨折者的行动能力和功能比未骨折者差,而合并症、认知功能和精神药物的使用情况相似。骨折者骨折前的行动能力优于年龄和性别匹配的从未发生过髋部骨折的居民。关于我们养老院人群中的髋部骨折,我们可以得出以下结论:(1)髋部骨折是机构养老的主要原因之一;(2)在大多数情况下,髋部骨折发生在养老院居住后期;(3)骨折发生在机构内时,其功能影响很大。我们还建议保持行动能力可能是养老院中髋部骨折的另一个风险因素。