Ghazal N, Agoub M, Moussaoui D, Battas O
Centre Psychiatrique Universitaire lbn Rochd, Rue Tarik Ibnou Ziad, Casablanca, Maroc.
Encephale. 2001 Jul-Aug;27(4):338-42.
During the two last decades, several epidemiological studies have been conducted on bulimia nervosa. According to recent studies, prevalence rates were estimated to be 1%. There are a very few studies on eating behaviour conducted in Arab countries. The aims of the current study were to assess prospectively the prevalence of Bulimia Nervosa and its characteristics in a Moroccan context in a randomly selected and representative sample of students attending six secondary schools in Casablanca. A second group composed of the students of the French secondary school of Casablanca was included in the survey in order to verify the influence of socio-cultural factors. Subjects completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Bulimic Investigatory Test of Edinburgh (BITE), a 33-item self-report measure of both the symptoms and severity of bulimia nervosa. A score of 25 or higher suggests a bulimic syndrome; 2,044 subjects returned their questionnaires (participation rate = 75.8%). The group of Moroccan school included 1,887 subjects and the French school 157 subjects. Females were preponderant (59%). The mean age was 18.3 +/- 1.2 years (15-22 years). For the first group, at least one substance was taken by 290 (15.3%) students: 12.7% were addicted to tobacco and 5.7% consumed occasionally alcohol. 16.3% reported a familial history of disturbed eating behaviour. According to the BITE, the overall prevalence of bulimia was 0.8% (1.2% in female and 0.1 in male subjects). The mean age of bulimic subjects was 18.6 +/- 1.7 years (16-24 years). The only male case in our sample was aged 24 years, without personal nor familial psychiatric history, consumed regularly tobacco and alcohol. His BITE symptoms score was 20 and severity score was 17, the highest score in our sample. Analyses of correlates of bulimia nervosa in the Moroccan sample showed that the group of bulimic subjects did not differ from the non bulimic with regard to any sociodemographic characteristics except sex: the female sex was predominant (p < 0.005) with 14 cases, the prevalence of bulimic syndrome was 1.2% among girls. This prevalence was 0.1% among boys. The bulimic subjects have regularly used different compensatory behaviours to control their weight: 6 (33.3%) used appetite suppressants, 3 (16.6%) used diuretics and 4 (22.2%) were engaged in self-induced vomiting. In the group of the french school, the prevalence of bulimia was 1.9% in the whole sample (3.4% among girls and no case among boys). These results are comparable to those reported recently in occidental countries and in an Egyptian study. However, the prevalence of bulimic syndrome in our sample was lower to those reported in countries with similar culture. The elevated prevalence of 10% reported in a tunisian study could be explained by the composition of the sample (medical students, aged 22-28 years) and the cut-off point for the BITE was determined to be 20 without taking into account severity criteria. A South African survey, conducted on 1,435 college students representing South Africa's ethnically and culturally diverse population comparable to our sample regarding the age (17-25 years), found a prevalence of 5% with a cut-off of 25 in the BITE. The majority of epidemiological community-based studies estimated the prevalence of bulimia nervosa to be 1 to 3% according to the diagnostic instruments used (self-report questionnaires versus clinical interviews) and the diagnostic criterias operationalized (DSM III, III-R or IV). The rate of occurrence of this disorder in males usually one-tenth of that in females was more decreased among our sample. However, the prevalence among males was comparable to the data of literature. Except the sex, we did not find other risk factors identified in the previous papers. Although in the bulimic group, we noted a higher rate of substance abuse (26.6% versus 15.2%, p > 0.5), familial histories of disturbed eating behaviour (26.6% versus 16.2%, p > 0.3) and less regular practice of sportive activity (72.2% versus 92.3%, p > 0.1), these differences are not statistically significant. The review of the literature identified at least 5 domains associated to bulimic disorder: parental problems (lower parental contact or separation, disruptive events), vulnerability to obesity, parental psychiatric disorder (alcoholism, depression), sexual or physical abuse and a premorbid psychiatric disorder. With the enormous media coverage and the globalisation of the media, cultural differences are disappearing. In order to estimate the prevalence of bulimia nervosa in the Moroccan population and to identify the risk factors, further epidemiological community-based studies using structured psychiatric interviews are required.
在过去二十年中,针对神经性贪食症开展了多项流行病学研究。根据近期研究,其患病率估计为1%。在阿拉伯国家,关于饮食行为的研究非常少。本研究的目的是,在卡萨布兰卡六所中学随机抽取的具有代表性的学生样本中,前瞻性地评估摩洛哥人群中神经性贪食症的患病率及其特征。为了验证社会文化因素的影响,调查还纳入了卡萨布兰卡法国中学的学生组成第二组。受试者完成了一份社会人口学调查问卷以及爱丁堡贪食症调查测试(BITE),这是一份包含33个项目的自我报告量表,用于测量神经性贪食症的症状和严重程度。得分25分及以上表明存在贪食症综合征;2044名受试者返回了问卷(参与率 = 75.8%)。摩洛哥学校组包括1887名受试者,法国学校组包括157名受试者。女性占多数(59%)。平均年龄为18.3 ± 1.2岁(15 - 22岁)。对于第一组,290名(15.3%)学生至少使用过一种物质:12.7%对烟草成瘾,5.7%偶尔饮酒。16.3%报告有饮食行为紊乱的家族史。根据BITE,贪食症的总体患病率为0.8%(女性为1.2%,男性为0.1%)。贪食症受试者的平均年龄为18.6 ± 1.7岁(16 - 24岁)。我们样本中的唯一男性病例为24岁,无个人或家族精神病史,经常吸烟和饮酒。他的BITE症状评分为20分,严重程度评分为17分,是我们样本中的最高分。对摩洛哥样本中神经性贪食症相关因素的分析表明,除性别外,贪食症组在任何社会人口学特征方面与非贪食症组均无差异:女性占主导(p < 0.005),有14例,女孩中贪食症综合征的患病率为1.2%。男孩中的患病率为0.1%。贪食症受试者经常使用不同的代偿行为来控制体重:6人(33.3%)使用食欲抑制剂,3人(16.6%)使用利尿剂,4人(22.2%)进行自我催吐。在法国学校组中,整个样本中贪食症的患病率为1.9%(女孩中为3.4%,男孩中无病例)。这些结果与西方国家最近报道的以及一项埃及研究的结果相当。然而,我们样本中贪食症综合征的患病率低于文化相似国家报道的患病率。突尼斯一项研究报告的10%的高患病率可能是由于样本组成(22 - 28岁的医学生)以及BITE的截断点设定为20,而未考虑严重程度标准。一项针对1435名大学生的南非调查,这些学生代表了南非种族和文化多样的人群,年龄与我们的样本相当(17 - 25岁),发现BITE截断值为25时患病率为5%。大多数基于社区的流行病学研究根据所使用的诊断工具(自我报告问卷与临床访谈)和实施的诊断标准(DSM III、III - R或IV),估计神经性贪食症的患病率为1%至3%。这种疾病在男性中的发生率通常是女性的十分之一,在我们的样本中下降得更多。然而,男性中的患病率与文献数据相当。除了性别,我们没有发现先前论文中确定的其他风险因素。尽管在贪食症组中,我们注意到药物滥用率较高(26.6%对15.2%,p > 0.5)、饮食行为紊乱的家族史较多(26.6%对16.2%,p > 0.3)以及体育活动的规律性较差(72.2%对92.3%,p > 0.1),但这些差异无统计学意义。文献综述确定了至少5个与贪食症相关的领域:父母问题(父母接触少或分居、破坏性行为)、易患肥胖症、父母精神障碍(酗酒、抑郁症)、性虐待或身体虐待以及病前精神障碍。随着媒体的大量报道和媒体的全球化,文化差异正在消失。为了估计摩洛哥人群中神经性贪食症的患病率并确定风险因素,需要进一步开展基于社区的使用结构化精神科访谈的流行病学研究。