Johnson T L, Keith D W
Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Oct;51(10):1452-9. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464370.
The decoupling of fossil-fueled electricity production from atmospheric CO2 emissions via CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS) is increasingly regarded as an important means of mitigating climate change at a reasonable cost. Engineering analyses of CO2 mitigation typically compare the cost of electricity for a base generation technology to that for a similar plant with CO2 capture and then compute the carbon emissions mitigated per unit of cost. It can be hard to interpret mitigation cost estimates from this plant-level approach when a consistent base technology cannot be identified. In addition, neither engineering analyses nor general equilibrium models can capture the economics of plant dispatch. A realistic assessment of the costs of carbon sequestration as an emissions abatement strategy in the electric sector therefore requires a systems-level analysis. We discuss various frameworks for computing mitigation costs and introduce a simplified model of electric sector planning. Results from a "bottom-up" engineering-economic analysis for a representative U.S. North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) region illustrate how the penetration of CCS technologies and the dispatch of generating units vary with the price of carbon emissions and thereby determine the relationship between mitigation cost and emissions reduction.
通过二氧化碳捕集与封存(CCS)使化石燃料发电与大气二氧化碳排放脱钩,日益被视为以合理成本缓解气候变化的重要手段。二氧化碳减排的工程分析通常会将基础发电技术的电力成本与配备二氧化碳捕集装置的类似电厂的电力成本进行比较,然后计算每单位成本所减少的碳排放量。当无法确定一致的基础技术时,很难从这种电厂层面的方法来解读减排成本估算。此外,工程分析和一般均衡模型都无法捕捉电厂调度的经济性。因此,要对碳封存作为电力部门减排策略的成本进行现实评估,就需要进行系统层面的分析。我们讨论了计算减排成本的各种框架,并引入了一个简化的电力部门规划模型。对美国北美电力可靠性委员会(NERC)一个代表性地区进行的“自下而上”工程经济分析结果表明,CCS技术的渗透率和发电机组的调度如何随碳排放价格变化,从而确定减排成本与减排量之间的关系。