Suppr超能文献

通过乳房X线摄影术筛查乳腺癌。

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

作者信息

Olsen O, Gøtzsche P C

机构信息

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, dept. 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen O, Denmark, DK-2100.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mammographic screening for breast cancer is controversial, as reflected in greatly varying national policies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of screening for breast cancer with mammography on mortality and morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (16 May 2000), The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's trial register (24 Jan 2000) and reference lists. Letters, abstracts and unpublished trials. Authors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing mammographic screening with no mammographic screening.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by both authors independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven completed and eligible trials involving half a million women were identified. The two best trials provided medium-quality data and, when combined, yield a relative risk for overall mortality of 1.00 (95% CI 0.96-1.05) after 13 years. However, the trials are underpowered for all-cause mortality, and confidence intervals include a possible worthwhile effect as well as a possible detrimental effect. If data from all eligible trials (excluding flawed studies) are considered then the relative risk for overall mortality after 13 years is 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.03). The best trials failed to show a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality with a relative risk of 0.97 (95% CI 0.82-1.14). If data from all eligible trials (excluding flawed studies) are considered then the relative risk for breast cancer mortality after 13 years is 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). However, breast cancer mortality is considered to be an unreliable outcome and biased in favour of screening. Flaws are due to differential exclusion of women with breast cancer from analysis and differential misclassification of cause of death.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The currently available reliable evidence does not show a survival benefit of mass screening for breast cancer (and the evidence is inconclusive for breast cancer mortality). Women, clinicians and policy makers should consider these findings carefully when they decide whether or not to attend or support screening programs.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌的乳腺钼靶筛查存在争议,各国政策差异很大就反映了这一点。

目的

评估乳腺钼靶筛查乳腺癌对死亡率和发病率的影响。

检索策略

MEDLINE(2000年5月16日)、Cochrane乳腺癌小组试验注册库(2000年1月24日)及参考文献列表。信件、摘要和未发表的试验。与作者进行了联系。

选择标准

比较乳腺钼靶筛查与非乳腺钼靶筛查的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立提取数据。

主要结果

确定了7项完成且符合条件的试验,涉及50万名女性。两项最佳试验提供了中等质量的数据,合并后13年后总体死亡率的相对风险为1.00(95%可信区间0.96 - 1.05)。然而,这些试验对全因死亡率的检验效能不足,可信区间既包括可能有价值的效果,也包括可能有害的效果。如果考虑所有符合条件试验(不包括有缺陷的研究)的数据,那么13年后总体死亡率的相对风险为1.01(95%可信区间0.99 - 1.03)。最佳试验未能显示乳腺癌死亡率有显著降低,相对风险为0.97(95%可信区间0.82 - 1.14)。如果考虑所有符合条件试验(不包括有缺陷的研究)的数据,那么13年后乳腺癌死亡率相对风险为0.80(95%可信区间0.71 - 0.89)。然而,乳腺癌死亡率被认为是一个不可靠的结果,且偏向于筛查。缺陷是由于分析中对患有乳腺癌的女性进行了不同程度的排除以及对死亡原因进行了不同程度的错误分类。

综述作者结论

目前可得的可靠证据并未显示乳腺癌群体筛查有生存获益(且关于乳腺癌死亡率的证据尚无定论)。女性、临床医生和政策制定者在决定是否参加或支持筛查项目时应仔细考虑这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验