• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业自我监管的准备工作。

Preparation for professional self-regulation.

作者信息

Braxton J M, Baird L L

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Department of Leadership and Organizations, Peabody College, Box 514, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(4):593-610. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0016-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-001-0016-8
PMID:11697014
Abstract

This article asserts that graduate study should include preparation for participation in the process of self-regulation to assure the responsible conduct of research in the scientific community. This article outlines the various ways in which doctoral study can incorporate such preparation. These suggested ways include the inculcation of general attitudes and values about professional self-regulation, various ways doctoral study can be configured so that future scientists are prepared to participate in the deterrence, detection and sanctioning of scientific wrongdoing. The stages of doctoral study in the United States and their relevance to preparation for self-regulations are also discussed. Recommendations regarding an extended role for faculty advisors, graduate assistantships, coursework and departmental policies and activities are also advanced.

摘要

本文认为,研究生学习应包括为参与自我监管过程做准备,以确保科学界负责任的研究行为。本文概述了博士学习纳入此类准备的各种方式。这些建议的方式包括灌输关于专业自我监管的一般态度和价值观,以及对博士学习进行各种安排,以便未来的科学家做好准备,参与对科研不当行为的威慑、发现和惩处。文中还讨论了美国博士学习的各个阶段及其与自我监管准备的相关性。此外,还提出了关于教师顾问、研究生助学金、课程作业以及部门政策和活动的扩展作用的建议。

相似文献

1
Preparation for professional self-regulation.专业自我监管的准备工作。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(4):593-610. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0016-8.
2
[Training PhD students in ethics and research integrity in France in 2018].2018年法国博士生的伦理与研究诚信培训
Med Sci (Paris). 2019 Jun-Jul;35(6-7):558-561. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2019101. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Mentoring the mentors: the Yoda factor in promoting scientific integrity.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):W17. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957682.
4
Graduate teaching in principles of scientific integrity.科学诚信原则的研究生教学。
Acad Med. 1993 Dec;68(12):879-86. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199312000-00003.
5
Research ethics education: the view from below.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):W5. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957439.
6
How many degrees of separation? Preparation, proximity and professionalism. Commentary on 'Help from faculty: findings from the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study'. (Anderson, Oji and Falkner).相隔多少度?准备、亲近度与专业素养。对《来自教师的帮助:阿卡迪亚学院研究生教育研究的结果》的评论。(安德森、奥吉和福克纳)
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(4):505-6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0007-9.
7
Institutional and individual responsibilities for integrity in research.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):51-3. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957574.
8
Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences.科研行为责任培训的效果:对实验科学领域研究生的一项调查
Sci Eng Ethics. 1998 Oct;4(4):487-98. doi: 10.1007/s11948-998-0041-y.
9
Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement.科研不端行为与科学过程:持续质量改进
Account Res. 2006 Jul-Sep;13(3):225-46. doi: 10.1080/08989620600848611.
10
The absent professor: why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it.缺席的教授:为何我们不教授研究伦理以及如何应对这一问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):38-49. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957556.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-drawing the line. A commentary on 'Preparation for professional self-regulation'. (Braxton and Baird).重新划定界限。对《专业自我监管的准备》的评论(布拉克斯顿和贝尔德)
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(4):611-4. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0017-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Fraud in science.科学领域中的欺诈行为。
Soc Sci Q. 1979 Mar;59(4):639-52.
2
Personal experiences of research misconduct and the response of individual academic scientists.
Sci Technol Human Values. 1996 Spring;21(2):198-213. doi: 10.1177/016224399602100204.
3
Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.研究中的不当行为:科学政策与实践问题。
Minerva. 1985 Summer;23(2):175-202. doi: 10.1007/BF01099941.