Mandal M K, Suar D, Bhattacharya T
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India.
Int J Neurosci. 2001 Jul;109(1-2):139-46. doi: 10.3109/00207450108986530.
This study purports to examine the role of different forms of side bias, handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness, in eliciting accident-proneness in individuals. A representative sample (N = 150) was administered a Side Bias Questionnaire (Handedness: 22 items, footedness: 5 items, eyedness: 5 items, earedness: 5 items) to ascertain their preferential bias. The questionnaire also required subjects to report the number of accidents committed during their lifetime while performing activities like sports, driving, household work, etc., that required attention of medical professionals. Regression analysis of data indicated that accident-prone behavior was significantly predicted from handedness. Analysis of variance, 3 (Accident groups: low, moderate, high) x 4 (Side bias: hand, foot, eye, ear), indicated that 'mixed' handers committed more accidents as compared with clear handers. The other forms of side bias, foot, ear, and eye were unrelated to frequency of accidents.
本研究旨在探讨不同形式的侧偏好、利手、利足、利眼和利耳在引发个体易事故倾向方面的作用。对一个代表性样本(N = 150)进行了侧偏好问卷(利手:22项,利足:5项,利眼:5项,利耳:5项)测试,以确定他们的偏好倾向。问卷还要求受试者报告在其一生中进行体育、驾驶、家务等需要医疗专业人员关注的活动时发生事故的次数。对数据的回归分析表明,利手能显著预测易事故行为。方差分析,3(事故组:低、中、高)×4(侧偏好:手、足、眼、耳),表明与明确利手者相比,“混合”利手者发生的事故更多。其他形式的侧偏好,如足、耳和眼,与事故发生频率无关。