Zero D, Fontana M, Lennon A M
Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):1126-32.
The aim of this review was to systematically assess clinical evidence in the literature to determine the predictive validity of currently available multivariate caries risk-assessment strategies (including environmental, sociodemographic, behavioral, microbiological, dietary/nutritional, and/or salivary risk factors) in: 1) primary teeth; 2) coronal surfaces of permanent teeth; and 3) root surfaces of permanent teeth. We identified 1,249 articles in the search, and selected 169 for full review. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established prior to commencement of the literature search. Papers that conformed to these criteria were included (n = 15 for primary teeth; n = 22 for permanent teeth; and n = 6 for root surfaces), and 126 papers were excluded. Included articles were grouped by study design as: longitudinal, retrospective, and cross-sectional. The predictive validity of the models reviewed depended strongly on the caries prevalence and characteristics of the population for which they were designed. In many instances, the use of a single predictor gave equally good results as the use of a combination of predictors. Previous caries experience was an important predictor for all tooth types.
本综述的目的是系统评估文献中的临床证据,以确定当前可用的多因素龋齿风险评估策略(包括环境、社会人口统计学、行为、微生物学、饮食/营养和/或唾液风险因素)在以下方面的预测效度:1)乳牙;2)恒牙的冠面;3)恒牙的根面。我们在检索中识别出1249篇文章,并选择了169篇进行全面审查。在文献检索开始前确定了纳入和排除标准。符合这些标准的论文被纳入(乳牙15篇;恒牙22篇;根面6篇),126篇论文被排除。纳入的文章按研究设计分为:纵向、回顾性和横断面研究。所审查模型的预测效度在很大程度上取决于其设计所针对人群的龋齿患病率和特征。在许多情况下,使用单一预测因素与使用多个预测因素组合的效果相当。既往龋齿经历是所有牙型的重要预测因素。