Friedman R A, Kesser B W, Slattery W H, Brackmann D E, Hitselberger W E
House Ear Clinic and House Ear Institute, the Piedmont Ear, Nose and Throat Associates, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Nov;125(5):544-51. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2001.119675.
We evaluated hearing outcomes in patients with sudden hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma who underwent a hearing preservation operation for tumor resection in an effort to determine whether a history of sudden sensorineural hearing loss has an impact on subsequent hearing preservation surgery.
Retrospective chart review of 45 patients operated between 1990 and 1998. Patients were divided into "Recovery" (n = 22) and "No Recovery" (n = 23) groups based on preoperative hearing recovery. Hearing preservation was assessed using the AAO-HNS hearing classification system.
Measurable hearing was preserved in 73% of patients, with 47% having good postoperative hearing (AAO-HNS Classes A-B). There was no significant difference in hearing outcome from patients presenting with progressive hearing loss (45% Classes A-B). There was also no difference in postoperative hearing between the "Recovery" and "No Recovery" groups.
Patients with sudden hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma have the same chance of hearing preservation after tumor removal as those with progressive loss. Preoperative recovery of hearing is not predictive of hearing preservation. Available data support the nerve compression theory as the mechanism of sudden hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma.
我们评估了突发性听力损失患者和前庭神经鞘瘤患者在接受肿瘤切除的听力保留手术时的听力结果,以确定突发性感音神经性听力损失病史是否会对后续的听力保留手术产生影响。
对1990年至1998年间接受手术的45例患者进行回顾性病历审查。根据术前听力恢复情况,将患者分为 “恢复组”(n = 22)和 “未恢复组”(n = 23)。使用美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO-HNS)听力分类系统评估听力保留情况。
73% 的患者保留了可测量的听力,47% 的患者术后听力良好(AAO-HNS A-B级)。与渐进性听力损失患者相比,听力结果没有显著差异(45% 为A-B级)。“恢复组” 和 “未恢复组” 之间的术后听力也没有差异。
突发性听力损失患者和前庭神经鞘瘤患者在肿瘤切除后保留听力的机会与渐进性听力损失患者相同。术前听力恢复不能预测听力保留情况。现有数据支持神经压迫理论作为前庭神经鞘瘤患者突发性听力损失的机制。