Suppr超能文献

专业标准审查组织(PSRO):优势、风险及潜在陷阱

PSRO: advantages, risks, and potential pitfalls.

作者信息

Dorsey R, Sullivan F

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1975 Aug;132(8):832-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.132.8.832.

Abstract

The authors propose that active physician participation in current review methodologies, including PSRO, can lessen the potential for such problems as the development of unrealistic standards, emphasis on review and record keeping as ends rather than means, and ineffectuality of the systems themselves. Potential advantages of PSRO are seen in areas of quality assessment and improvement, economy, and enhancement of the continuing learning processess of physicians. The authors suggest that physicians should resist pressures toward separation of reviewing authority from clinical competence.

摘要

作者们提出,医生积极参与当前的评审方法,包括专业标准评审组织(PSRO),可以减少出现诸如制定不切实际的标准、将评审和记录保存视为目的而非手段以及系统本身无效等问题的可能性。PSRO的潜在优势体现在质量评估与改进、经济以及增强医生持续学习过程等方面。作者们建议,医生应抵制将评审权与临床能力分离的压力。

引用本文的文献

1
Health insurance and psychiatry: one peer reviewer's perspective.
Psychiatr Q. 1984 Fall;56(3):167-77. doi: 10.1007/BF01065008.
2
Standards and quality control: problems and pitfalls.
Adm Ment Health. 1976 Spring;3(2):146-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02619675.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验