• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近端尿道下裂。分期尿道成形术(改良蒂尔施·杜普莱手术,随后行马蒂厄手术)与一期覆盖岛状皮瓣修复术的比较评估。

Proximal hypospadias. Comparative evaluation of staged urethroplasty (modified Thiersch Duplay followed by Mathieu) and single stage on-lay island flap repair.

作者信息

Samuel M, Capps S, Worth A

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, St. George's Health Care NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2001 Oct;40(4):463-8. doi: 10.1159/000049817.

DOI:10.1159/000049817
PMID:11713404
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Comparative analysis of functional results, complications, cosmesis, operative time and hospital stay between staged urethroplasty and single-stage on-lay island flap for proximal hypospadias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Non-randomised single observer study of two groups of patients over a 5-year period with proximal hypospadias. Group 1 had 17 patients (mean age 17.7+/-1.6 months) who underwent a staged urethroplasty. Urethral plate was tubularised and proximal hypospadias converted to a distal hypospadias. Hooded dorsal prepuce was buttonholed and transposed ventrally to cover the neo-urethra. Subsequently a parameatal based flip flap urethroplasty completed urethral reconstruction. Group 2 had 17 patients (mean age 18.2+/-2.2 months) with a single stage inner preputial on-lay island flap based on superficial dorsal vessels.

RESULTS

Mean period of follow-up has been 2.8+/-1.7 years in group 1 vs. 3.2+/-1.6 years in group 2 (p = 0.2). In both groups (34), 79% of the children who are now toilet trained and standing to void have a good calibre straight single stream of urine in a forward direction (p = 1.00). Main complication seen in both groups was urethrocutaneous fistulae: 6% (1/17) in group 1 vs. 59% (10/17) in group 2 (p = 0.0002). In both groups (34) cosmetic appearance of a natural vertical slit glanular meatus situated at the normal position on the glans was achieved (p = 1.00). Total mean duration of operative time in group 1 was 193.5+/-42.9 vs. 203+/-27.6 min in group 2 (p = 0.24). Total mean duration of hospital stay in group 1 was 3.4+/-0.6 vs. 9.2+/-2.9 days in group 2 (p = 0.0001). Total mean cost of the procedure in group 1 was 2,347.3 pounds +/- 220 vs. 3,753.5 pounds +/- 75 in group 2 (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Staged urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias results in a normal penis with good function, minimal complications and excellent cosmesis. Hospital stay was shorter and overall cost lower than a single stage on-lay island flap urethroplasty.

摘要

目的

比较分期尿道成形术与一期带蒂岛状皮瓣修复术治疗近端型尿道下裂在功能恢复、并发症、美观效果、手术时间及住院时间方面的差异。

材料与方法

对两组近端型尿道下裂患者进行为期5年的非随机单观察者研究。第1组有17例患者(平均年龄17.7±1.6个月),接受分期尿道成形术。将尿道板管状化,近端型尿道下裂转变为远端型尿道下裂。将带帽状的背侧包皮戳孔并向腹侧移位以覆盖新建尿道。随后进行基于尿道口的翻转皮瓣尿道成形术完成尿道重建。第2组有17例患者(平均年龄18.2±2.2个月),接受基于浅表背侧血管的一期内侧包皮带蒂岛状皮瓣修复术。

结果

第1组平均随访时间为2.8±1.7年,第2组为3.2±1.6年(p = 0.2)。两组共34例患者中,79%已接受如厕训练且站立排尿的儿童尿液排出顺畅,呈良好的单股向前直线尿流(p = 1.00)。两组主要并发症均为尿道皮肤瘘:第1组为6%(1/17),第2组为59%(10/17)(p = 0.0002)。两组共34例患者均实现了龟头尿道口呈自然垂直裂隙状且位于龟头正常位置的美观效果(p = 1.00)。第1组手术总平均时间为193.5±42.9分钟,第2组为203±27.6分钟(p = 0.24)。第1组住院总平均时间为3.4±0.6天,第2组为9.2±2.9天(p = 0.0001)。第1组手术总平均费用为2347.3英镑±220,第2组为3753.5英镑±75(p = 0.002)。

结论

分期尿道成形术治疗近端型尿道下裂可使阴茎功能良好、并发症少、美观效果佳。与一期带蒂岛状皮瓣尿道成形术相比,住院时间更短,总体费用更低。

相似文献

1
Proximal hypospadias. Comparative evaluation of staged urethroplasty (modified Thiersch Duplay followed by Mathieu) and single stage on-lay island flap repair.近端尿道下裂。分期尿道成形术(改良蒂尔施·杜普莱手术,随后行马蒂厄手术)与一期覆盖岛状皮瓣修复术的比较评估。
Eur Urol. 2001 Oct;40(4):463-8. doi: 10.1159/000049817.
2
Staged proximal hypospadias repair: Modified thiersch duplay with midline incision in urethral plate followed by Mathieu urethroplasty.
J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Jan;37(1):104-7. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.29438.
3
Distal hypospadias: which repair?远端尿道下裂:选择何种修复方式?
BJU Int. 2002 Jul;90(1):88-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02828.x.
4
Staged transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty for some proximal hypospadias with moderate-to-severe chordee.分期横形包皮岛状皮瓣尿道成形术治疗中重度尿道下裂伴近端阴茎下弯
BMC Urol. 2021 Dec 23;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00948-8.
5
The Effect of Staged Transverse Preputial Island Flap Urethroplasty for Proximal Hypospadias with Severe Chordee.分期横形带蒂包皮岛状皮瓣尿道成形术治疗严重弯曲型近端型尿道下裂的疗效。
J Urol. 2016 Nov;196(5):1536-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.098. Epub 2016 May 31.
6
Separation of the glanular part of the urethral plate, mobilization of the distal part of the neourethra, and creation of the glanular groove: a new modification of second-stage Thiersch-Duplay urethroplasty in proximal hypospadias repair.尿道板腺体部分的分离、新尿道远端的游离以及腺体沟的创建:近端尿道下裂修复中二期蒂尔施 - 杜普莱尿道成形术的一种新改良。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Mar;56(3):813-818. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03833-5. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
7
Eccentric circummeatal based flap with limited urethral mobilization: An easy technique for distal hypospadias repair.基于尿道口偏心的皮瓣且尿道活动受限:一种用于远端尿道下裂修复的简易技术。
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Apr;12(2):116.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
8
Transverse preputial onlay island flap urethroplasty for single-stage correction of proximal hypospadias.横行包皮岛状皮瓣尿道成形术用于一期矫正近端尿道下裂。
World J Urol. 2016 Jul;34(7):1019-24. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1686-1. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
9
Proximal hypospadias with severe chordee: single stage repair using corporeal tunica vaginalis free graft.重度阴茎下弯的近端尿道下裂:采用游离阴茎白膜移植的一期修复术
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):1036-42; discussion 1042. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.062. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
10
Versatility of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in the management of different types of hypospadias: 5-year experience.管状切开板尿道成形术在不同类型尿道下裂治疗中的多功能性:5年经验
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2009 Jul-Dec;6(2):88-92. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.54770.

引用本文的文献

1
Two-stage repair for proximal hypospadias: a reappraisal.近端尿道下裂的两阶段修复:重新评估
Curr Urol Rep. 2003 Apr;4(2):151-5. doi: 10.1007/s11934-003-0043-x.